Oral bacterial adhesion forces to biomaterial surfaces constituting the bracket-adhesive-enamel junction in orthodontic treatment
Bacterial adhesion to biomaterial surfaces constituting the bracket–adhesive–enamel junction represents a growing problem in orthodontics, because bacteria can adversely affect treatment by causing demineralization of the enamel surface around the brackets. It is important to know the forces with wh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of oral sciences 2009-08, Vol.117 (4), p.419-426 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Bacterial adhesion to biomaterial surfaces constituting the bracket–adhesive–enamel junction represents a growing problem in orthodontics, because bacteria can adversely affect treatment by causing demineralization of the enamel surface around the brackets. It is important to know the forces with which bacteria adhere to the surfaces of these junction materials, as the strength of these forces will determine how easy it will be to remove the bacteria. We compared the adhesion forces of five initially colonizing and four cariogenic strains of bacteria to an orthodontic adhesive, stainless steel, and enamel, with and without a salivary conditioning film. Adhesion forces were determined using atomic force microscopy and a bacterial probe. In the absence of a salivary conditioning film, the strongest bacterial adhesion forces occurred to the adhesive surface (−2.9 to −6.9 nN), while adhesion forces to the enamel surfaces were lowest (−0.8 to −2.7 nN). In the presence of a salivary conditioning film, adhesion forces were reduced strongly, to less than 1 nN, and the differences between the various materials were reduced. Generally, however, initial colonizers of dental hard surfaces presented stronger adhesion forces to the different materials (−4.7 and −0.6 nN in the absence and presence of a salivary conditioning film, respectively) than cariogenic strains (−1.8 and −0.5 nN). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0909-8836 1600-0722 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00648.x |