Comment on Zekeri (2007)
Zekeri's comments (2007) on Bridges and Kunselman's work (2005) were not sufficiently grounded in sociological theory, the calculation of the “rates of potential years of life lost” (PYLL) was modified but unreported, and the use of PYLL, despite limitations as a measure of premature morta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological reports 2009-04, Vol.104 (2), p.418-420 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 420 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 418 |
container_title | Psychological reports |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Bridges, F. Stephen Kunselman, Julie C. |
description | Zekeri's comments (2007) on Bridges and Kunselman's work (2005) were not sufficiently grounded in sociological theory, the calculation of the “rates of potential years of life lost” (PYLL) was modified but unreported, and the use of PYLL, despite limitations as a measure of premature mortality “was not justified.” The theoretical framework, however, consisted of “environmental” and “social group” statements which gave a specific means for grounding “premature mortality” in sociological theory, and findings were consistent with Lester's social deviancy theory of suicide (1989). How the “rates of PYLL” were calculated, i.e., by the Canadian government is misinterpreted, although Allard, et al. (2004) provided justification for the use of age-standardized rates of PYLL in their 2005 study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2466/PR0.104.2.418-420 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67497192</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.2466_PR0.104.2.418-420</sage_id><sourcerecordid>67497192</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-8aaa0d78336a9b64c0f2f8abed86df453c0e95304db5a3a25050c417d7d57a753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEURoModqzudSNdiS5mvHknyzL4goIiCuImZCYZaZ1HTToL_72RFty5uvfC-T64B6EzDAVhQlw_PUOBgRWkYFjljMAeyjDnKhcav-2jDIDSnGiGJ-goxlU6MVB5iCZYi5STkKHTcug6329mQz97958-LGeXBEBeHaODxrbRn-zmFL3e3ryU9_ni8e6hnC_ymmjY5MpaC04qSoXVlWA1NKRRtvJOCdcwTmvwmlNgruKWWsKBQ82wdNJxaSWnU3Sx7V2H4Wv0cWO6Zax929reD2M0QjItsSYJxFuwDkOMwTdmHZadDd8Gg_nVYZKOtDNDTNJhko6UOd-Vj1Xn3V9i938Cii0Q7Yc3q2EMfXr2n8YfJnNljg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67497192</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comment on Zekeri (2007)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Bridges, F. Stephen ; Kunselman, Julie C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bridges, F. Stephen ; Kunselman, Julie C.</creatorcontrib><description>Zekeri's comments (2007) on Bridges and Kunselman's work (2005) were not sufficiently grounded in sociological theory, the calculation of the “rates of potential years of life lost” (PYLL) was modified but unreported, and the use of PYLL, despite limitations as a measure of premature mortality “was not justified.” The theoretical framework, however, consisted of “environmental” and “social group” statements which gave a specific means for grounding “premature mortality” in sociological theory, and findings were consistent with Lester's social deviancy theory of suicide (1989). How the “rates of PYLL” were calculated, i.e., by the Canadian government is misinterpreted, although Allard, et al. (2004) provided justification for the use of age-standardized rates of PYLL in their 2005 study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-691X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2466/PR0.104.2.418-420</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19610470</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Birth Rate ; Humans ; Mortality ; Research Design - standards ; Statistics as Topic</subject><ispartof>Psychological reports, 2009-04, Vol.104 (2), p.418-420</ispartof><rights>2009 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-8aaa0d78336a9b64c0f2f8abed86df453c0e95304db5a3a25050c417d7d57a753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2466/PR0.104.2.418-420$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2466/PR0.104.2.418-420$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19610470$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bridges, F. Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunselman, Julie C.</creatorcontrib><title>Comment on Zekeri (2007)</title><title>Psychological reports</title><addtitle>Psychol Rep</addtitle><description>Zekeri's comments (2007) on Bridges and Kunselman's work (2005) were not sufficiently grounded in sociological theory, the calculation of the “rates of potential years of life lost” (PYLL) was modified but unreported, and the use of PYLL, despite limitations as a measure of premature mortality “was not justified.” The theoretical framework, however, consisted of “environmental” and “social group” statements which gave a specific means for grounding “premature mortality” in sociological theory, and findings were consistent with Lester's social deviancy theory of suicide (1989). How the “rates of PYLL” were calculated, i.e., by the Canadian government is misinterpreted, although Allard, et al. (2004) provided justification for the use of age-standardized rates of PYLL in their 2005 study.</description><subject>Birth Rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Research Design - standards</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><issn>0033-2941</issn><issn>1558-691X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEURoModqzudSNdiS5mvHknyzL4goIiCuImZCYZaZ1HTToL_72RFty5uvfC-T64B6EzDAVhQlw_PUOBgRWkYFjljMAeyjDnKhcav-2jDIDSnGiGJ-goxlU6MVB5iCZYi5STkKHTcug6329mQz97958-LGeXBEBeHaODxrbRn-zmFL3e3ryU9_ni8e6hnC_ymmjY5MpaC04qSoXVlWA1NKRRtvJOCdcwTmvwmlNgruKWWsKBQ82wdNJxaSWnU3Sx7V2H4Wv0cWO6Zax929reD2M0QjItsSYJxFuwDkOMwTdmHZadDd8Gg_nVYZKOtDNDTNJhko6UOd-Vj1Xn3V9i938Cii0Q7Yc3q2EMfXr2n8YfJnNljg</recordid><startdate>200904</startdate><enddate>200904</enddate><creator>Bridges, F. Stephen</creator><creator>Kunselman, Julie C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200904</creationdate><title>Comment on Zekeri (2007)</title><author>Bridges, F. Stephen ; Kunselman, Julie C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-8aaa0d78336a9b64c0f2f8abed86df453c0e95304db5a3a25050c417d7d57a753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Birth Rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Research Design - standards</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bridges, F. Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunselman, Julie C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bridges, F. Stephen</au><au>Kunselman, Julie C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comment on Zekeri (2007)</atitle><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Rep</addtitle><date>2009-04</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>418</spage><epage>420</epage><pages>418-420</pages><issn>0033-2941</issn><eissn>1558-691X</eissn><abstract>Zekeri's comments (2007) on Bridges and Kunselman's work (2005) were not sufficiently grounded in sociological theory, the calculation of the “rates of potential years of life lost” (PYLL) was modified but unreported, and the use of PYLL, despite limitations as a measure of premature mortality “was not justified.” The theoretical framework, however, consisted of “environmental” and “social group” statements which gave a specific means for grounding “premature mortality” in sociological theory, and findings were consistent with Lester's social deviancy theory of suicide (1989). How the “rates of PYLL” were calculated, i.e., by the Canadian government is misinterpreted, although Allard, et al. (2004) provided justification for the use of age-standardized rates of PYLL in their 2005 study.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>19610470</pmid><doi>10.2466/PR0.104.2.418-420</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-2941 |
ispartof | Psychological reports, 2009-04, Vol.104 (2), p.418-420 |
issn | 0033-2941 1558-691X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67497192 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Birth Rate Humans Mortality Research Design - standards Statistics as Topic |
title | Comment on Zekeri (2007) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A12%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comment%20on%20Zekeri%20(2007)&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20reports&rft.au=Bridges,%20F.%20Stephen&rft.date=2009-04&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=418&rft.epage=420&rft.pages=418-420&rft.issn=0033-2941&rft.eissn=1558-691X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2466/PR0.104.2.418-420&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67497192%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67497192&rft_id=info:pmid/19610470&rft_sage_id=10.2466_PR0.104.2.418-420&rfr_iscdi=true |