Comment on Zekeri (2007)

Zekeri's comments (2007) on Bridges and Kunselman's work (2005) were not sufficiently grounded in sociological theory, the calculation of the “rates of potential years of life lost” (PYLL) was modified but unreported, and the use of PYLL, despite limitations as a measure of premature morta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological reports 2009-04, Vol.104 (2), p.418-420
Hauptverfasser: Bridges, F. Stephen, Kunselman, Julie C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 420
container_issue 2
container_start_page 418
container_title Psychological reports
container_volume 104
creator Bridges, F. Stephen
Kunselman, Julie C.
description Zekeri's comments (2007) on Bridges and Kunselman's work (2005) were not sufficiently grounded in sociological theory, the calculation of the “rates of potential years of life lost” (PYLL) was modified but unreported, and the use of PYLL, despite limitations as a measure of premature mortality “was not justified.” The theoretical framework, however, consisted of “environmental” and “social group” statements which gave a specific means for grounding “premature mortality” in sociological theory, and findings were consistent with Lester's social deviancy theory of suicide (1989). How the “rates of PYLL” were calculated, i.e., by the Canadian government is misinterpreted, although Allard, et al. (2004) provided justification for the use of age-standardized rates of PYLL in their 2005 study.
doi_str_mv 10.2466/PR0.104.2.418-420
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67497192</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.2466_PR0.104.2.418-420</sage_id><sourcerecordid>67497192</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-8aaa0d78336a9b64c0f2f8abed86df453c0e95304db5a3a25050c417d7d57a753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEURoModqzudSNdiS5mvHknyzL4goIiCuImZCYZaZ1HTToL_72RFty5uvfC-T64B6EzDAVhQlw_PUOBgRWkYFjljMAeyjDnKhcav-2jDIDSnGiGJ-goxlU6MVB5iCZYi5STkKHTcug6329mQz97958-LGeXBEBeHaODxrbRn-zmFL3e3ryU9_ni8e6hnC_ymmjY5MpaC04qSoXVlWA1NKRRtvJOCdcwTmvwmlNgruKWWsKBQ82wdNJxaSWnU3Sx7V2H4Wv0cWO6Zax929reD2M0QjItsSYJxFuwDkOMwTdmHZadDd8Gg_nVYZKOtDNDTNJhko6UOd-Vj1Xn3V9i938Cii0Q7Yc3q2EMfXr2n8YfJnNljg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67497192</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comment on Zekeri (2007)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Bridges, F. Stephen ; Kunselman, Julie C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bridges, F. Stephen ; Kunselman, Julie C.</creatorcontrib><description>Zekeri's comments (2007) on Bridges and Kunselman's work (2005) were not sufficiently grounded in sociological theory, the calculation of the “rates of potential years of life lost” (PYLL) was modified but unreported, and the use of PYLL, despite limitations as a measure of premature mortality “was not justified.” The theoretical framework, however, consisted of “environmental” and “social group” statements which gave a specific means for grounding “premature mortality” in sociological theory, and findings were consistent with Lester's social deviancy theory of suicide (1989). How the “rates of PYLL” were calculated, i.e., by the Canadian government is misinterpreted, although Allard, et al. (2004) provided justification for the use of age-standardized rates of PYLL in their 2005 study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-691X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2466/PR0.104.2.418-420</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19610470</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Birth Rate ; Humans ; Mortality ; Research Design - standards ; Statistics as Topic</subject><ispartof>Psychological reports, 2009-04, Vol.104 (2), p.418-420</ispartof><rights>2009 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-8aaa0d78336a9b64c0f2f8abed86df453c0e95304db5a3a25050c417d7d57a753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2466/PR0.104.2.418-420$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2466/PR0.104.2.418-420$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19610470$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bridges, F. Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunselman, Julie C.</creatorcontrib><title>Comment on Zekeri (2007)</title><title>Psychological reports</title><addtitle>Psychol Rep</addtitle><description>Zekeri's comments (2007) on Bridges and Kunselman's work (2005) were not sufficiently grounded in sociological theory, the calculation of the “rates of potential years of life lost” (PYLL) was modified but unreported, and the use of PYLL, despite limitations as a measure of premature mortality “was not justified.” The theoretical framework, however, consisted of “environmental” and “social group” statements which gave a specific means for grounding “premature mortality” in sociological theory, and findings were consistent with Lester's social deviancy theory of suicide (1989). How the “rates of PYLL” were calculated, i.e., by the Canadian government is misinterpreted, although Allard, et al. (2004) provided justification for the use of age-standardized rates of PYLL in their 2005 study.</description><subject>Birth Rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Research Design - standards</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><issn>0033-2941</issn><issn>1558-691X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEURoModqzudSNdiS5mvHknyzL4goIiCuImZCYZaZ1HTToL_72RFty5uvfC-T64B6EzDAVhQlw_PUOBgRWkYFjljMAeyjDnKhcav-2jDIDSnGiGJ-goxlU6MVB5iCZYi5STkKHTcug6329mQz97958-LGeXBEBeHaODxrbRn-zmFL3e3ryU9_ni8e6hnC_ymmjY5MpaC04qSoXVlWA1NKRRtvJOCdcwTmvwmlNgruKWWsKBQ82wdNJxaSWnU3Sx7V2H4Wv0cWO6Zax929reD2M0QjItsSYJxFuwDkOMwTdmHZadDd8Gg_nVYZKOtDNDTNJhko6UOd-Vj1Xn3V9i938Cii0Q7Yc3q2EMfXr2n8YfJnNljg</recordid><startdate>200904</startdate><enddate>200904</enddate><creator>Bridges, F. Stephen</creator><creator>Kunselman, Julie C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200904</creationdate><title>Comment on Zekeri (2007)</title><author>Bridges, F. Stephen ; Kunselman, Julie C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-8aaa0d78336a9b64c0f2f8abed86df453c0e95304db5a3a25050c417d7d57a753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Birth Rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Research Design - standards</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bridges, F. Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunselman, Julie C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bridges, F. Stephen</au><au>Kunselman, Julie C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comment on Zekeri (2007)</atitle><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Rep</addtitle><date>2009-04</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>418</spage><epage>420</epage><pages>418-420</pages><issn>0033-2941</issn><eissn>1558-691X</eissn><abstract>Zekeri's comments (2007) on Bridges and Kunselman's work (2005) were not sufficiently grounded in sociological theory, the calculation of the “rates of potential years of life lost” (PYLL) was modified but unreported, and the use of PYLL, despite limitations as a measure of premature mortality “was not justified.” The theoretical framework, however, consisted of “environmental” and “social group” statements which gave a specific means for grounding “premature mortality” in sociological theory, and findings were consistent with Lester's social deviancy theory of suicide (1989). How the “rates of PYLL” were calculated, i.e., by the Canadian government is misinterpreted, although Allard, et al. (2004) provided justification for the use of age-standardized rates of PYLL in their 2005 study.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>19610470</pmid><doi>10.2466/PR0.104.2.418-420</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2941
ispartof Psychological reports, 2009-04, Vol.104 (2), p.418-420
issn 0033-2941
1558-691X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67497192
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Birth Rate
Humans
Mortality
Research Design - standards
Statistics as Topic
title Comment on Zekeri (2007)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A12%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comment%20on%20Zekeri%20(2007)&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20reports&rft.au=Bridges,%20F.%20Stephen&rft.date=2009-04&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=418&rft.epage=420&rft.pages=418-420&rft.issn=0033-2941&rft.eissn=1558-691X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2466/PR0.104.2.418-420&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67497192%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67497192&rft_id=info:pmid/19610470&rft_sage_id=10.2466_PR0.104.2.418-420&rfr_iscdi=true