Comment on Zekeri (2007)

Zekeri's comments (2007) on Bridges and Kunselman's work (2005) were not sufficiently grounded in sociological theory, the calculation of the “rates of potential years of life lost” (PYLL) was modified but unreported, and the use of PYLL, despite limitations as a measure of premature morta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological reports 2009-04, Vol.104 (2), p.418-420
Hauptverfasser: Bridges, F. Stephen, Kunselman, Julie C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Zekeri's comments (2007) on Bridges and Kunselman's work (2005) were not sufficiently grounded in sociological theory, the calculation of the “rates of potential years of life lost” (PYLL) was modified but unreported, and the use of PYLL, despite limitations as a measure of premature mortality “was not justified.” The theoretical framework, however, consisted of “environmental” and “social group” statements which gave a specific means for grounding “premature mortality” in sociological theory, and findings were consistent with Lester's social deviancy theory of suicide (1989). How the “rates of PYLL” were calculated, i.e., by the Canadian government is misinterpreted, although Allard, et al. (2004) provided justification for the use of age-standardized rates of PYLL in their 2005 study.
ISSN:0033-2941
1558-691X
DOI:10.2466/PR0.104.2.418-420