Treatment of Depression Improves Physical Functioning in Older Adults

Objectives: To determine the effect of collaborative care management for depression on physical functioning in older adults. Design: Multisite randomized clinical trial. Setting: Eighteen primary care clinics from eight healthcare organizations. Participants: One thousand eight hundred one patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2005-03, Vol.53 (3), p.367-373
Hauptverfasser: Callahan, Christopher M., Kroenke, Kurt, Counsell, Steven R., Hendrie, Hugh C., Perkins, Anthony J., Katon, Wayne, Noel, Polly Hitchcock, Harpole, Linda, Hunkeler, Enid M., Unützer, Jürgen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives: To determine the effect of collaborative care management for depression on physical functioning in older adults. Design: Multisite randomized clinical trial. Setting: Eighteen primary care clinics from eight healthcare organizations. Participants: One thousand eight hundred one patients aged 60 and older with major depressive disorder. Intervention: Patients were randomized to the Improving Mood: Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment (IMPACT) intervention (n=906) or to a control group receiving usual care (n=895). Control patients had access to all health services available as part of usual care. Intervention patients had access for 12 months to a depression clinical specialist who coordinated depression care with their primary care physician. Measurements: The 12‐item short form Physical Component Summary (PCS) score (range 0–100) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) (range 0–7). Results: The mean patient age was 71.2, 65% were women, and 77% were white. At baseline, the mean PCS was 40.2, and the mean number of IADL dependencies was 0.7; 45% of participants rated their health as fair or poor. Intervention patients experienced significantly better physical functioning at 1 year than usual‐care patients as measured using between‐group differences on the PCS of 1.71 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.96–2.46) and IADLs of −0.15 (95% CI=−0.29 to −0.01). Intervention patients were also less likely to rate their health as fair or poor (37.3% vs 52.4%, P
ISSN:0002-8614
1532-5415
DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53151.x