Dermatological surgery: a comparison of activity and outcomes in primary and secondary care

Summary Background  Dermatological surgery is carried out by a variety of practitioners in primary and secondary care. Objectives  To explore the activity and histopathological outcomes among different groups of dermatological surgeons dealing with skin cancers. Methods  Reports for all new skin tum...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of dermatology (1951) 2009-07, Vol.161 (1), p.110-114
Hauptverfasser: Goulding, J.M.R., Levine, S., Blizard, R.A., Deroide, F., Swale, V.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background  Dermatological surgery is carried out by a variety of practitioners in primary and secondary care. Objectives  To explore the activity and histopathological outcomes among different groups of dermatological surgeons dealing with skin cancers. Methods  Reports for all new skin tumour specimens processed by our histopathology department over a continuous 3‐month period were reviewed retrospectively. Results  One thousand, one hundred and eleven new skin tumour specimens were identified. General practitioners (GPs) were least accurate in clinical diagnosis, with 42·8% (59/138) of their request forms including the eventual histological diagnosis, compared with 69·5% (328/472) for dermatologists (odds ratio, OR 0·33, 95% confidence interval, CI 0·22–0·48). Inappropriate procedures were most often performed by plastic surgeons, usually involving large excision biopsies for benign lesions in elderly patients [6·6% (20/305) of their specimens vs. 0% for dermatologists, exact P 
ISSN:0007-0963
1365-2133
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09228.x