Assessing the assessments: U.K. dermatology trainees' views of the workplace assessment tools

Summary Background The workplace assessments, direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS), mini‐clinical evaluation exercise (mini‐CEX) and multisource feedback (MSF, formerly known as 360° appraisal), are now mandatory during dermatology specialist training in the U.K. The opinions of those undergoing such assessments in any medical specialty have rarely been sought. Objectives To collate the experience and views of U.K. dermatology trainees on the three workplace assessments. Method A questionnaire was circulated in autumn 2006 to all U.K. dermatology specialist registrars (SpRs) registered as members of the British Association of Dermatologists (n = 269). Results A total of 138 responses were received (51%). Seventeen SpRs had not experienced any of the assessments; 92 had undergone MSF, 95 DOPS and 54 mini‐CEX. The total experience of the respondents amounted to a minimum of 251 DOPS, 122 MSF and 142 mini‐CEX. Trainees appreciated the formative aspects of the assessments, especially feedback and training opportunities, although not all trainees reported receiving useful feedback. MSF was praised for the insights that it provides. All of the assessments were found to be time‐consuming and difficult to organize. DOPS and mini‐CEX carried a degree of stress and artificiality. Concerns were raised over the possibility of victimization by MSF raters. Discussion of performance in the assessments was rarely prominent in trainees’ annual summative reviews. Conclusions Trainees appreciate the formative benefits which derive from the assessments, namely feedback, reassurance of satisfactory performance and, in the case of DOPS and mini‐CEX, additional one‐to‐one training from consultants. Some problems came to light. The issues raised will not be unique to dermatology and other specialties should take note.