Barriers to Satisfactory Migraine Outcomes. What Have We Learned, Where Do We Stand?

Barriers to optimal migraine care have traditionally been divided into a number of categories: under‐recognition and underconsultation by migraine sufferers; underdiagnosis and undertreatment by health care professionals; lack of follow‐up and treatment optimization. These “traditional” barriers hav...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Headache 2009-07, Vol.49 (7), p.1028-1041
Hauptverfasser: Bigal, Marcelo, Krymchantowski, Abouch Valenty, Lipton, Richard B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Barriers to optimal migraine care have traditionally been divided into a number of categories: under‐recognition and underconsultation by migraine sufferers; underdiagnosis and undertreatment by health care professionals; lack of follow‐up and treatment optimization. These “traditional” barriers have been recognized and addressed for at least 15 years. Epidemiologic studies suggest that consultation, diagnosis, and treatment rates for migraine have improved although many migraine sufferers still do not get optimal treatment. Herein, we revisit the problem, review areas of progress, and expand the discussion of barriers to migraine care. We hypothesize that the subjective nature of pain and difficulty in communicating it contributes to clinical and societal barriers to care. We then revisit some of the traditional barriers to care, contrasting rates of recognition, diagnosis, and treatment over the past 15 years. We follow by addressing new barriers to migraine care that have emerged as a function of the knowledge gained in this process.
ISSN:0017-8748
1526-4610
DOI:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01410.x