Clinical-Diffusion Mismatch and Benefit From Thrombolysis 3 to 6 Hours After Acute Stroke

The clinical-diffusion mismatch (CDM) model has been proposed as a simpler tool than perfusion-diffusion mismatch (PDM) to select acute ischemic stroke patients for thrombolytic therapy. We hypothesized that in the 3- to 6-hour time window, the effect of tPA was significantly greater in patients wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Stroke (1970) 2009-07, Vol.40 (7), p.2572-2574
Hauptverfasser: EBINGER, Martin, IWANAGA, Takeshi, DONNAN, Geoffrey A, DAVIS, Stephen M, PROSSER, Jane F, DE SILVA, Deidre A, CHRISTENSEN, Soren, COLLINS, Marnie, PARSONS, Mark W, LEVI, Christopher R, BLADIN, Christopher F, BARBER, P. Alan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The clinical-diffusion mismatch (CDM) model has been proposed as a simpler tool than perfusion-diffusion mismatch (PDM) to select acute ischemic stroke patients for thrombolytic therapy. We hypothesized that in the 3- to 6-hour time window, the effect of tPA was significantly greater in patients with CDM than in patients without CDM. This is a substudy of EPITHET, a double-blind multi-center study of 100 patients randomized to tPA or placebo 3 to 6 hours after stroke onset. MRI was obtained before treatment, and at 3 to 5 days and 90 days after treatment. Presence of PDM (perfusion deficit/DWI(volume) >1.2 and perfusion deficit at least 10 mL>DWI(volume)) and CDM (NIHSS >or=8 and DWI(volume) or=8 points between baseline and 90 days, or a 90-day NIHSS
ISSN:0039-2499
1524-4628
DOI:10.1161/strokeaha.109.548073