Clinical-Diffusion Mismatch and Benefit From Thrombolysis 3 to 6 Hours After Acute Stroke
The clinical-diffusion mismatch (CDM) model has been proposed as a simpler tool than perfusion-diffusion mismatch (PDM) to select acute ischemic stroke patients for thrombolytic therapy. We hypothesized that in the 3- to 6-hour time window, the effect of tPA was significantly greater in patients wit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Stroke (1970) 2009-07, Vol.40 (7), p.2572-2574 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The clinical-diffusion mismatch (CDM) model has been proposed as a simpler tool than perfusion-diffusion mismatch (PDM) to select acute ischemic stroke patients for thrombolytic therapy. We hypothesized that in the 3- to 6-hour time window, the effect of tPA was significantly greater in patients with CDM than in patients without CDM.
This is a substudy of EPITHET, a double-blind multi-center study of 100 patients randomized to tPA or placebo 3 to 6 hours after stroke onset. MRI was obtained before treatment, and at 3 to 5 days and 90 days after treatment. Presence of PDM (perfusion deficit/DWI(volume) >1.2 and perfusion deficit at least 10 mL>DWI(volume)) and CDM (NIHSS >or=8 and DWI(volume) or=8 points between baseline and 90 days, or a 90-day NIHSS |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0039-2499 1524-4628 |
DOI: | 10.1161/strokeaha.109.548073 |