Epoprostenol use in a National Pulmonary Hypertension Centre from 1997 to 2007
The cost-effectiveness of prostanoids in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has recently been called into question by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), 1 and the possibility exists that this treatment would not be recommended by this body. Guidelines published by t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Thorax 2009-07, Vol.64 (7), p.642-642 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The cost-effectiveness of prostanoids in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has recently been called into question by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), 1 and the possibility exists that this treatment would not be recommended by this body. Guidelines published by the UK, European and US authorities still advocate prostanoid use in certain patient groups. 2 - 4 Of the disease-targeted therapy available for PAH, only epoprostenol has been shown to improve patient survival in the context of a randomised controlled trial. 5 To assess the impact that withdrawal of intravenous epoprostenol in 1997 would have had, its use was retrospectively reviewed in a well-defined population of patients with PAH. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0040-6376 1468-3296 |
DOI: | 10.1136/thx.2008.110643 |