Agonist “flare-up” versus antagonist in the management of poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment
To compare the agonist flare-up and antagonist protocols in the management of poor responders to the standard long down-regulation protocol. Retrospective comparative study. Assisted conception center. One hundred thirty-four patients undergoing IVF/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fertility and sterility 2005-02, Vol.83 (2), p.331-335 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To compare the agonist flare-up and antagonist protocols in the management of poor responders to the standard long down-regulation protocol.
Retrospective comparative study.
Assisted conception center.
One hundred thirty-four patients undergoing IVF/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment, who responded poorly to the standard long down-regulation protocol in their first treatment cycle. In the second cycle, 77 received short flare-up agonist and 57 received antagonist protocol. We analyzed the outcome of the second cycle.
Peak serum E
2 was assayed on the day of hCG administration.
Cycle cancellation rate due to poor ovarian response.
There was no cycle cancellation in the flare-up protocol and 7% cancellation rate in the antagonist protocol due to lack of response. A significantly higher number of patients had embryo transfer in the flare-up protocol. There was no difference in pregnancy rate (PR) between the two groups.
Both the flare-up and the antagonist protocols significantly improved the ovarian response of known poor responders. However, a significantly higher cycle cancellation rate and less patients having embryo transfer in the antagonist group tips the balance in favor of the flare-up protocol. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0015-0282 1556-5653 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.07.963 |