Soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self-contained dehiscences. A 12-month controlled clinical trial
Aim: To assess soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self‐contained dehiscences. Material and methods: For this 12‐month controlled clinical trial, 15 subjects received immediate transmucosal tapered‐effect (TE) implants placed in mola...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral implants research 2009-05, Vol.20 (5), p.482-488 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 488 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 482 |
| container_title | Clinical oral implants research |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Siciliano, V. Iorio Salvi, G. E. Matarasso, S. Cafiero, C. Blasi, A. Lang, N. P. |
| description | Aim: To assess soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self‐contained dehiscences.
Material and methods: For this 12‐month controlled clinical trial, 15 subjects received immediate transmucosal tapered‐effect (TE) implants placed in molar extraction sockets displaying a buccal bone dehiscence (test sites) with a height and a width of ≥3 mm, respectively. Peri‐implant marginal defects were treated according to the principles of Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) by means of deproteinized bovine bone mineral particles in conjunction with a bioresorbable collagen membrane. Fifteen subjects received implants in healed molar sites (control sites) with intact buccal alveolar walls following tooth extraction. In total, 30 TE implants with an endosseous diameter of 4.8 mm and a shoulder diameter of 6.5 mm were used. Flaps were repositioned and sutured, allowing non‐submerged, transmucosal soft tissues healing. At the 12‐month follow‐up, pocket probing depths (PPD) and clinical attachment levels (CAL) were compared between implants placed in the test and the control sites, respectively.
Results: All subjects completed the 12‐month follow‐up period. All implants healed uneventfully, yielding a survival rate of 100%. After 12 months, statistically significantly higher (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01688.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67376361</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67376361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4368-f1dee12dc8eaab9dab64d9fe1369a3022946b6e9c553a8436f2629f56e13bf183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctuEzEUhi0EoiHwCsgrdjPY44xjL1iUiKZIEUhc2u4sj-cMcfCMg-1R0yfqa9bTRGUJ3hzL5__OxT9CmJKS5vN-V1JOSEFqQsuKEFESyoUoD8_Q7CnxHM2IJHWxpJyeoVcx7gghXAr5Ep1RWQlaEzZD9999l3CyMY4Q8Ra0s8MvrBO2fQ-t1QlwCnqI_Wh81C4_750eUsQ5GGixHZLHvXc6YDhkpUnWDzjalKvd2rTFzWhM5iK4rjB-SNoOGWtha6OBwUAs8TmmVdHn3BZPiuCdyxKTJ7ETmoLV7jV60WkX4c0pztHPi08_VpfF5uv68-p8U5gF46LoaAtAq9YI0LqRrW74opUdUMalZqSq5II3HKSpa6ZFRrqKV7KreVY0HRVsjt4d6-6D_5O_JKl-GtTlpcGPUfElW3LG6T-FFamXUuY2cySOQhN8jAE6tQ-21-FOUaImN9VOTaapyTQ1uake3VSHjL499Rib7MZf8GRfFnw4Cm6tg7v_LqxWm2_TLfPFkbcxweGJ1-H346K1uv6yVqurm2tG1h8VZw8MF8Df</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20579955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self-contained dehiscences. A 12-month controlled clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Siciliano, V. Iorio ; Salvi, G. E. ; Matarasso, S. ; Cafiero, C. ; Blasi, A. ; Lang, N. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Siciliano, V. Iorio ; Salvi, G. E. ; Matarasso, S. ; Cafiero, C. ; Blasi, A. ; Lang, N. P.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: To assess soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self‐contained dehiscences.
Material and methods: For this 12‐month controlled clinical trial, 15 subjects received immediate transmucosal tapered‐effect (TE) implants placed in molar extraction sockets displaying a buccal bone dehiscence (test sites) with a height and a width of ≥3 mm, respectively. Peri‐implant marginal defects were treated according to the principles of Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) by means of deproteinized bovine bone mineral particles in conjunction with a bioresorbable collagen membrane. Fifteen subjects received implants in healed molar sites (control sites) with intact buccal alveolar walls following tooth extraction. In total, 30 TE implants with an endosseous diameter of 4.8 mm and a shoulder diameter of 6.5 mm were used. Flaps were repositioned and sutured, allowing non‐submerged, transmucosal soft tissues healing. At the 12‐month follow‐up, pocket probing depths (PPD) and clinical attachment levels (CAL) were compared between implants placed in the test and the control sites, respectively.
Results: All subjects completed the 12‐month follow‐up period. All implants healed uneventfully, yielding a survival rate of 100%. After 12 months, statistically significantly higher (P<0.05) PPD and CAL values were recorded around implants placed in the test sites compared with those placed in the control sites.
Conclusions: The findings of this controlled clinical trial showed that healing following immediate transmucosal implant installation in molar extraction sites with wide and shallow buccal dehiscences yielded less favorable outcomes compared with those of implants placed in healed sites, and resulted in lack of ‘complete’ osseointegration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01688.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19281503</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Animals ; Bone Matrix - transplantation ; buccal dehiscence ; Cattle ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Crowns ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods ; Dental Implants, Single-Tooth ; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported ; Dental Restoration Failure ; Dentistry ; extraction socket ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) ; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - methods ; Humans ; immediate implants ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minerals - therapeutic use ; Molar ; Mouth Mucosa - physiology ; Osseointegration - drug effects ; Osseointegration - physiology ; Periodontal Index ; Prospective Studies ; Surgical Wound Dehiscence - complications ; Surgical Wound Dehiscence - therapy ; tapered implants ; Tooth Extraction ; Tooth Socket - drug effects ; Tooth Socket - surgery ; transmucosal healing ; Wound Healing - drug effects ; Wound Healing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2009-05, Vol.20 (5), p.482-488</ispartof><rights>2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4368-f1dee12dc8eaab9dab64d9fe1369a3022946b6e9c553a8436f2629f56e13bf183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4368-f1dee12dc8eaab9dab64d9fe1369a3022946b6e9c553a8436f2629f56e13bf183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0501.2008.01688.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0501.2008.01688.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19281503$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siciliano, V. Iorio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvi, G. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matarasso, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cafiero, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blasi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, N. P.</creatorcontrib><title>Soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self-contained dehiscences. A 12-month controlled clinical trial</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><description>Aim: To assess soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self‐contained dehiscences.
Material and methods: For this 12‐month controlled clinical trial, 15 subjects received immediate transmucosal tapered‐effect (TE) implants placed in molar extraction sockets displaying a buccal bone dehiscence (test sites) with a height and a width of ≥3 mm, respectively. Peri‐implant marginal defects were treated according to the principles of Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) by means of deproteinized bovine bone mineral particles in conjunction with a bioresorbable collagen membrane. Fifteen subjects received implants in healed molar sites (control sites) with intact buccal alveolar walls following tooth extraction. In total, 30 TE implants with an endosseous diameter of 4.8 mm and a shoulder diameter of 6.5 mm were used. Flaps were repositioned and sutured, allowing non‐submerged, transmucosal soft tissues healing. At the 12‐month follow‐up, pocket probing depths (PPD) and clinical attachment levels (CAL) were compared between implants placed in the test and the control sites, respectively.
Results: All subjects completed the 12‐month follow‐up period. All implants healed uneventfully, yielding a survival rate of 100%. After 12 months, statistically significantly higher (P<0.05) PPD and CAL values were recorded around implants placed in the test sites compared with those placed in the control sites.
Conclusions: The findings of this controlled clinical trial showed that healing following immediate transmucosal implant installation in molar extraction sites with wide and shallow buccal dehiscences yielded less favorable outcomes compared with those of implants placed in healed sites, and resulted in lack of ‘complete’ osseointegration.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bone Matrix - transplantation</subject><subject>buccal dehiscence</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</subject><subject>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Failure</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>extraction socket</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)</subject><subject>Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>immediate implants</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minerals - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Molar</subject><subject>Mouth Mucosa - physiology</subject><subject>Osseointegration - drug effects</subject><subject>Osseointegration - physiology</subject><subject>Periodontal Index</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - complications</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - therapy</subject><subject>tapered implants</subject><subject>Tooth Extraction</subject><subject>Tooth Socket - drug effects</subject><subject>Tooth Socket - surgery</subject><subject>transmucosal healing</subject><subject>Wound Healing - drug effects</subject><subject>Wound Healing - physiology</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctuEzEUhi0EoiHwCsgrdjPY44xjL1iUiKZIEUhc2u4sj-cMcfCMg-1R0yfqa9bTRGUJ3hzL5__OxT9CmJKS5vN-V1JOSEFqQsuKEFESyoUoD8_Q7CnxHM2IJHWxpJyeoVcx7gghXAr5Ep1RWQlaEzZD9999l3CyMY4Q8Ra0s8MvrBO2fQ-t1QlwCnqI_Wh81C4_750eUsQ5GGixHZLHvXc6YDhkpUnWDzjalKvd2rTFzWhM5iK4rjB-SNoOGWtha6OBwUAs8TmmVdHn3BZPiuCdyxKTJ7ETmoLV7jV60WkX4c0pztHPi08_VpfF5uv68-p8U5gF46LoaAtAq9YI0LqRrW74opUdUMalZqSq5II3HKSpa6ZFRrqKV7KreVY0HRVsjt4d6-6D_5O_JKl-GtTlpcGPUfElW3LG6T-FFamXUuY2cySOQhN8jAE6tQ-21-FOUaImN9VOTaapyTQ1uake3VSHjL499Rib7MZf8GRfFnw4Cm6tg7v_LqxWm2_TLfPFkbcxweGJ1-H346K1uv6yVqurm2tG1h8VZw8MF8Df</recordid><startdate>200905</startdate><enddate>200905</enddate><creator>Siciliano, V. Iorio</creator><creator>Salvi, G. E.</creator><creator>Matarasso, S.</creator><creator>Cafiero, C.</creator><creator>Blasi, A.</creator><creator>Lang, N. P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200905</creationdate><title>Soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self-contained dehiscences. A 12-month controlled clinical trial</title><author>Siciliano, V. Iorio ; Salvi, G. E. ; Matarasso, S. ; Cafiero, C. ; Blasi, A. ; Lang, N. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4368-f1dee12dc8eaab9dab64d9fe1369a3022946b6e9c553a8436f2629f56e13bf183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bone Matrix - transplantation</topic><topic>buccal dehiscence</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</topic><topic>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Failure</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>extraction socket</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)</topic><topic>Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>immediate implants</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minerals - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Molar</topic><topic>Mouth Mucosa - physiology</topic><topic>Osseointegration - drug effects</topic><topic>Osseointegration - physiology</topic><topic>Periodontal Index</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - complications</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - therapy</topic><topic>tapered implants</topic><topic>Tooth Extraction</topic><topic>Tooth Socket - drug effects</topic><topic>Tooth Socket - surgery</topic><topic>transmucosal healing</topic><topic>Wound Healing - drug effects</topic><topic>Wound Healing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siciliano, V. Iorio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvi, G. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matarasso, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cafiero, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blasi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, N. P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siciliano, V. Iorio</au><au>Salvi, G. E.</au><au>Matarasso, S.</au><au>Cafiero, C.</au><au>Blasi, A.</au><au>Lang, N. P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self-contained dehiscences. A 12-month controlled clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><date>2009-05</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>482</spage><epage>488</epage><pages>482-488</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Aim: To assess soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self‐contained dehiscences.
Material and methods: For this 12‐month controlled clinical trial, 15 subjects received immediate transmucosal tapered‐effect (TE) implants placed in molar extraction sockets displaying a buccal bone dehiscence (test sites) with a height and a width of ≥3 mm, respectively. Peri‐implant marginal defects were treated according to the principles of Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) by means of deproteinized bovine bone mineral particles in conjunction with a bioresorbable collagen membrane. Fifteen subjects received implants in healed molar sites (control sites) with intact buccal alveolar walls following tooth extraction. In total, 30 TE implants with an endosseous diameter of 4.8 mm and a shoulder diameter of 6.5 mm were used. Flaps were repositioned and sutured, allowing non‐submerged, transmucosal soft tissues healing. At the 12‐month follow‐up, pocket probing depths (PPD) and clinical attachment levels (CAL) were compared between implants placed in the test and the control sites, respectively.
Results: All subjects completed the 12‐month follow‐up period. All implants healed uneventfully, yielding a survival rate of 100%. After 12 months, statistically significantly higher (P<0.05) PPD and CAL values were recorded around implants placed in the test sites compared with those placed in the control sites.
Conclusions: The findings of this controlled clinical trial showed that healing following immediate transmucosal implant installation in molar extraction sites with wide and shallow buccal dehiscences yielded less favorable outcomes compared with those of implants placed in healed sites, and resulted in lack of ‘complete’ osseointegration.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>19281503</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01688.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0905-7161 |
| ispartof | Clinical oral implants research, 2009-05, Vol.20 (5), p.482-488 |
| issn | 0905-7161 1600-0501 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67376361 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Adult Animals Bone Matrix - transplantation buccal dehiscence Cattle Chi-Square Distribution Crowns Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods Dental Implants, Single-Tooth Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported Dental Restoration Failure Dentistry extraction socket Female Follow-Up Studies Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - methods Humans immediate implants Male Middle Aged Minerals - therapeutic use Molar Mouth Mucosa - physiology Osseointegration - drug effects Osseointegration - physiology Periodontal Index Prospective Studies Surgical Wound Dehiscence - complications Surgical Wound Dehiscence - therapy tapered implants Tooth Extraction Tooth Socket - drug effects Tooth Socket - surgery transmucosal healing Wound Healing - drug effects Wound Healing - physiology |
| title | Soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self-contained dehiscences. A 12-month controlled clinical trial |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T12%3A47%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soft%20tissues%20healing%20at%20immediate%20transmucosal%20implants%20placed%20into%20molar%20extraction%20sites%20with%20buccal%20self-contained%20dehiscences.%20A%2012-month%20controlled%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Siciliano,%20V.%20Iorio&rft.date=2009-05&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=482&rft.epage=488&rft.pages=482-488&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01688.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67376361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20579955&rft_id=info:pmid/19281503&rfr_iscdi=true |