Changes in respiratory control after 5 days at altitude
These experiments examined changes in the chemoreflex control of breathing and acid–base balance after 5 days at altitude (3480 m) in six healthy males. The partial pressures of carbon dioxide ( P C O 2 ) at which ventilation increased during isoxic hypoxic and hyperoxic modified rebreathing tests a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Respiratory physiology & neurobiology 2005-01, Vol.145 (1), p.41-52 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | These experiments examined changes in the chemoreflex control of breathing and acid–base balance after 5 days at altitude (3480
m) in six healthy males. The partial pressures of carbon dioxide (
P
C
O
2
) at which ventilation increased during isoxic hypoxic and hyperoxic modified rebreathing tests at sea level fell significantly at altitude by mean
±
S.E.M. of 12.8
±
2.51
mmHg and 9.5
±
1.77
mmHg, respectively, but response slopes above threshold were unchanged. Altitude exposure produced a respiratory alkalosis evidenced by a decrease in mean resting end-tidal
P
C
O
2
from 41
±
0.84
mmHg at sea level to 32
±
2.04
mmHg at altitude, but pH did not increase significantly from its sea level value. Blood samples were analyzed to discover acid–base changes, using a modification of the equations for acid–base balance proposed by [Stewart, P.A., 1983. Modern quantitative acid–base chemistry. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 61, 1444–1461]. While strong ion difference at altitude was not significantly different from its sea level value, albumin concentration was increased significantly from 38.6
±
0.30
g
L
−1 to 49.8
±
0.76
g
L
−1. We suggest that the respiratory alkalosis was produced by a fall in the chemoreflex threshold and pH was corrected by an elevation in the concentration of weakly dissociated protein anions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1569-9048 1878-1519 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.resp.2004.11.004 |