Collecting baseline corticosterone samples in the field: is under 3 min good enough?
Evaluating corticosterone (CORT) responses to stress in free-living vertebrates requires knowing the unstressed titers prior to capture. Based upon laboratory data, the assumption has been that samples collected in less than 3 min of capture will reflect these unstressed concentrations. This assumpt...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology Molecular & integrative physiology, 2005, Vol.140 (1), p.73-79 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Evaluating corticosterone (CORT) responses to stress in free-living vertebrates requires knowing the unstressed titers prior to capture. Based upon laboratory data, the assumption has been that samples collected in less than 3 min of capture will reflect these unstressed concentrations. This assumption was tested for six species using samples collected from 945 individuals at 0–6 min after capture. Samples were from five avian species trapped at multiple times of year and one reptilian species, comprising a total of 14 different data sets for comparisons. For seven of 14 data sets, including five species, there was no significant increase in corticosterone titers within 3 min of capture. In six of the 14 data sets, corticosterone titers increased significantly after 2 min, and in one data set, the increase started at 1.5 min. In all seven of the cases showing an increase before 3 min, however, corticosterone titers from the time of increase to 3 min were significantly lower than titers after 30 min of restraint stress. These results indicate a high degree of confidence for these species that samples collected in less than 2 min reflect unstressed (baseline) concentrations, and that samples collected from 2–3 min also will likely reflect baseline concentrations but at worst are near baseline. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1095-6433 1531-4332 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cbpb.2004.11.004 |