The conditions for which the geometric mean method revealed a more accurate calculation of relative renal function in 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy

AIMS(1) To compare the results of calculating relative renal function (RRF) by using only posterior images (POST) with the geometric mean (GM) through both anterior and posterior imaging on dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scintigraphy. (2) To determine whether there was an age-related difference between them and whether some renal pathologies or asymmetrical renal function cause an error in the RRF calculation by using posterior images only. METHODSEight hundred and ninety-one DMSA scans were studied retrospectively. The patients were divided into five age groupsgroup I, ≤2 years; group II, >2 to ≤5 years; group III, >5 to ≤10 years; group IV, >10 to ≤18 years; and group V, >18 years. The RRF of the right kidney (RKF) was calculated from the POST and GM counts. The differences between RKFGM and RKFPOST were calculated in all the patients. RESULTSAmong the 891 patients, nine had malrotated or malpositioned kidneys, 373 had renal pathologies of pyelonephritis, hydronephrosis, cortical scarring and atrophy, 247 had asymmetrically functioning kidneys and 509 had normal kidneys. When the patients were analysed according to different age groups, significant differences were found between all groups (P0.05) with the F-test. The clinically meaningful RRF variance (≥5% difference between two methods) rate differed significantly between groups I, II and III, and groups IV and V (chi-squared test, P