Coping Effectiveness Training During Acute Rehabilitation of Spinal Cord Injury/Dysfunction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Purpose: To compare coping effectiveness training (CET) with supportive group therapy (SGT) for anxiety, depression, and adjustment to injury in an acute spinal cord injury/dysfunction (SCI/D) rehabilitation population. CET was shown to result in decreased anxiety and depression symptoms when compar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rehabilitation psychology 2009-05, Vol.54 (2), p.123-132
Hauptverfasser: Duchnick, Jennifer J, Letsch, Elizabeth A, Curtiss, Glenn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: To compare coping effectiveness training (CET) with supportive group therapy (SGT) for anxiety, depression, and adjustment to injury in an acute spinal cord injury/dysfunction (SCI/D) rehabilitation population. CET was shown to result in decreased anxiety and depression symptoms when compared to historical no-treatment control groups ( Kennedy, Duff, Evans, & Beedie, 2003 ; King & Kennedy, 1999 ). The present study sought to extend those findings with a comparison of CET to an alternative active therapy condition, SGT. Research Method: Participants ( N = 40) entering a hospital-based program were assigned to treatment condition using block randomization. Questionnaire mood measures were completed at program admission, program discharge, and 3-month postdischarge follow-up. Adjustment to disability was assessed at follow-up only. Analyses of variance tested for group differences in anxiety, depression, and adjustment to injury. Results: Both groups reported reductions in mood symptoms with no differences between treatment conditions. However, similar reductions were obtained after fewer sessions of CET. Symptoms of depression increased in both groups following hospital discharge. Conclusions: Clinical and research implications, including innovative interventions during the period after discharge, are discussed.
ISSN:0090-5550
1939-1544
DOI:10.1037/a0015571