Electroencephalographic analysis for the assessment of hepatic encephalopathy: Comparison of non-parametric and parametric spectral estimation techniques

Summary Objective To compare electroencephalographic spectral analysis obtained by periodogram (calculated by means of Fast Fourier Transform) and autoregressive (AR) modelling for the assessment of hepatic encephalopathy. Methods The mean dominant frequency (MDF) and the relative power of delta, th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurophysiologie clinique 2009-04, Vol.39 (2), p.107-115
Hauptverfasser: Amodio, P, Orsato, R, Marchetti, P, Schiff, S, Poci, C, Angeli, P, Gatta, A, Sparacino, G, Toffolo, G.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Objective To compare electroencephalographic spectral analysis obtained by periodogram (calculated by means of Fast Fourier Transform) and autoregressive (AR) modelling for the assessment of hepatic encephalopathy. Methods The mean dominant frequency (MDF) and the relative power of delta, theta, alpha, and beta bands were computed by both techniques from the electroencephalograms (EEG) of 201 cirrhotics and were evaluated in the clinical and prognostic assessment of the patients. Results The values of all the five indexes computed by periodogram and AR modelling matched each other, but the latter provided stable values after the analysis of fewer epochs. Independently of the technique, the relative power of theta and alpha bands fitted the clinical data and had prognostic value. The relative power of beta and delta bands computed by AR modelling fitted more closely with clinical data fitted the clinical data more closely. Conclusions The electroencephalographic spectral indexes obtained by periodogram and AR modelling were found to be, on average, undistinguishable, but the latter appeared less sensitive to noise and provided a more reliable assessment of low-power bands.
ISSN:0987-7053
1769-7131
DOI:10.1016/j.neucli.2009.02.002