Stress dose steroids in renal transplant patients undergoing lymphocele surgery
The requirement for perioperative stress dose steroids (SDS) in patients on long-term steroid therapy is controversial, but SDS are given during perioperative care. Studies focusing on surrogate outcomes like cortisol levels indicate a possible requirement for SDS, but clinical results are sparse. W...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transplantation proceedings 2004-12, Vol.36 (10), p.3042-3045 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The requirement for perioperative stress dose steroids (SDS) in patients on long-term steroid therapy is controversial, but SDS are given during perioperative care. Studies focusing on surrogate outcomes like cortisol levels indicate a possible requirement for SDS, but clinical results are sparse. We retrospectively compared outcomes of renal or pancreas/kidney transplant patients undergoing surgical lymphocele drainage who did (
n = 20) or did not (
n = 38) receive SDS. Patients had similar demographic characteristics (
P = NS). No patient developed hypotension (SBP < 80 mm Hg), mental status change, unexplained arthralgias, or ileus. Impaired wound healing occurred in one patient in each group (
P = NS), and lymphocele recurrence occurred in 25% of the SDS group and 10.5% of the other group (
P = .25). SBP decreased from baseline in both groups (
P < .001) but did not differ between groups, and maximum blood glucose was higher in the SDS group (
P = .04). No difference was observed in other measured parameters. These data indicate that SDS increased the risk of hyperglycemia and provided no apparent benefit. A prospective study is warranted to confirm these findings. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0041-1345 1873-2623 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.10.068 |