Lung afferent activity: Implications for respiratory sensation

Abstract Stimuli within the lung can cause the sensations of pain, ache, irritation and urge-to-cough. In general these are abolished or inhibited by vagal section or vagal anaesthesia, or local anaesthesia within the airways. They are present in patients with functional high cervical spinal cord tr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory physiology & neurobiology 2009-05, Vol.167 (1), p.2-8
1. Verfasser: Widdicombe, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Stimuli within the lung can cause the sensations of pain, ache, irritation and urge-to-cough. In general these are abolished or inhibited by vagal section or vagal anaesthesia, or local anaesthesia within the airways. They are present in patients with functional high cervical spinal cord transaction and after general neuromuscular paralysis. There are at least nine sensors in the bronchopulmonary system, studied almost entirely in animals. It is at present impossible to link any one sensor with any one pattern of sensation. It is reasonable to suppose that urge-to-cough arises from sensors what mediate cough, but there are at least five sensors involved in this reflex, and how they relate to unpleasant sensation is unknown. The problem is that sensation can almost only be studied in humans, and the vagal neural mechanisms almost only in other species. Vagal sensors can also ameliorate the sensation of air hunger, and this is probably due to the action of slowly adapting pulmonary stretch receptors (SARs). The same sensors may give rise to the awareness of lung volume and its changes. Many sensors in the lungs can be sensitized or desensitized by natural or imposed conditions, and this could underlie the sensitization and desensitization of dyspnoeic sensations that have been described.
ISSN:1569-9048
1878-1519
DOI:10.1016/j.resp.2008.09.012