Pathological Classification of DCIS and Planning of Therapeutic Management

Background: Ductal intraepitelial neoplasia (DIN) represents a spectrum of disease that may progress from usual hyperplasia to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) grade 3. The aim of the study was to asses the correlation between the DIN classification and the surgical treatment including sentinel lymph...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anticancer research 2009-05, Vol.29 (5), p.1499-1506
Hauptverfasser: BUONOMO, O, ORSARIA, P, DEL MONTE, G, ROSELLI, M, MINEO, T. C, PETRELLA, G, CONTINUO, G, VARVARAS, D, GIOIA, A, BONANNO, E, PISTOLESE, C, COSSU, E, PERRETTA, T, SCHILLACI, O
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Ductal intraepitelial neoplasia (DIN) represents a spectrum of disease that may progress from usual hyperplasia to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) grade 3. The aim of the study was to asses the correlation between the DIN classification and the surgical treatment including sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Patients and Methods: In this retrospective study, 229 patients with DIN had undergone conservative or radical surgical treatment and SLNB in cases of DIN1C-DIN3. Results: Breast conservative surgery was the definitive treatment in 80% of the cases. The H&E evaluation of excised sentinel nodes was negative for metastatic disease; neverthless the immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation revealed the presence of metastatic cells in 6 patients (3.7%). Conclusion: In cases of DIN lesions SLNB is not indicated. The only reason SLNB should be considered is when there is an evidence of invasive foci at definitive histology or when radical mastectomy is proposed.
ISSN:0250-7005
1791-7530