Acoustically evoked potentials in two cephalopods inferred using the auditory brainstem response (ABR) approach

It is still a matter of debate whether cephalopods can detect sound frequencies above 400 Hz. So far there is no proof for the detection of underwater sound above 400 Hz via a physiological approach. The controversy of whether cephalopods have a sound detection ability above 400 Hz was tested using...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology Molecular & integrative physiology, 2009-07, Vol.153 (3), p.278-283
Hauptverfasser: Hu, Marian Y., Yan, Hong Young, Chung, Wen-Sung, Shiao, Jen-Chieh, Hwang, Pung-Pung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:It is still a matter of debate whether cephalopods can detect sound frequencies above 400 Hz. So far there is no proof for the detection of underwater sound above 400 Hz via a physiological approach. The controversy of whether cephalopods have a sound detection ability above 400 Hz was tested using the auditory brainstem response (ABR) approach, which has been successfully applied in fish, crustaceans, amphibians, reptiles and birds. Using ABR we found that auditory evoked potentials can be obtained in the frequency range 400 to 1500 Hz ( Sepiotheutis lessoniana) and 400 to 1000 Hz ( Octopus vulgaris), respectively. The thresholds of S. lessoniana were generally lower than those of O. vulgaris.
ISSN:1095-6433
1531-4332
DOI:10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.02.040