Impact of SPECT and integrated low-dose CT after radioiodine therapy on the management of patients with thyroid carcinoma

AIMTo determine the value of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with integrated low-dose computed tomography (CT) for the interpretation of inconclusive foci in planar I whole-body scans after radioiodine therapy. METHODSTwenty-five patients with inconclusive findings in planar scann...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nuclear medicine communications 2004-12, Vol.25 (12), p.1177-1182
Hauptverfasser: Ruf, Juri, Lehmkuhl, Lukas, Bertram, Helga, Sandrock, Dirk, Amthauer, Holger, Humplik, Beatrice, Ludwig Munz, Dieter, Felix, Roland
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:AIMTo determine the value of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with integrated low-dose computed tomography (CT) for the interpretation of inconclusive foci in planar I whole-body scans after radioiodine therapy. METHODSTwenty-five patients with inconclusive findings in planar scanning after ablative radioiodine therapy (3.7 GBq I) due to differentiated thyroid cancer were included. SPECT/CT of the region in question was performed with the Millennium VG Hawkeye (GE Medical Systems). SPECT with and without CT fusion were evaluated by two blinded independent nuclear medicine physicians in a consensus reading (including visual plausibility control). Each focus was judged according to its topographical assignment and clinical interpretation. With regard to therapeutic relevance, this information was evaluated in a focus based and patient based analysis. All evaluations used a binary ranking system. Focus assignments were compared to clinical and imaging follow-up. RESULTSForty-one lesions were observed in 25 patients. According to follow-up, 17/41 (41%) foci were caused by thyroid residue, 13/41 (32%) were caused by metastases, and 11/41 (27%) were not malignant. Of these foci, a SPECT/CT consensus reading assigned 39 (95%) correctly, as fused images of two foci did not pass the visual plausibility control (excluding one patient due to misregistration). For the remaining 39 foci, improved anatomical assignment by SPECT/CT was seen in 17/39 (44%) cases. CONCLUSIONSThe changed interpretation of 15/39 (38%) foci would have been relevant for therapy in the focus based analysis. In the patient based analysis the information was still therapeutically relevant in 6/24 (25%) patients. Furthermore, plausibility control is also crucial in SPECT/CT image fusion in order to rule out artifacts.
ISSN:0143-3636
DOI:10.1097/00006231-200412000-00004