Effects of Probucol versus Aspirin and versus Brachytherapy on Restenosis after Femoropopliteal Angioplasty: The PAB Randomized Multicenter Trial

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of probucol and/or of endovascular brachytherapy (EVBT) on restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of femoropopliteal arteries. Methods: A total of 335 patients (206 men; mean age 72±9 years) with intermittent claudication were randomized accordin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endovascular therapy 2004-12, Vol.11 (6), p.595-604
Hauptverfasser: Gallino, Augusto, Do, Dai-Do, Alerci, Mario, Baumgartner, Iris, Cozzi, Luca, Segatto, Jeanne Marie, Bernier, Jacques, Tutta, Paolo, Kellner, Frauke, Triller, Jürgen, Schneider, Ernst, Amann-Vesti, Beatrice, Studer, Gabriele, Jäger, Kurt, Aschwanden, Markus, Canevascini, Reto, Jacob, Augustinus L., Kann, Roger, Greiner, Richard, Mahler, Felix
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: To evaluate the effect of probucol and/or of endovascular brachytherapy (EVBT) on restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of femoropopliteal arteries. Methods: A total of 335 patients (206 men; mean age 72±9 years) with intermittent claudication were randomized according to a 2×2 factorial design to 1 of the 4 groups: probucol, placebo, EVBT, and EVBT+probucol. Probucol (1 g/d) or placebo were given in double-blinded fashion 1 month before and for 6 months after PTA. Gamma irradiation (192Iridium, 14 Gy, 5-mm reference depth) was randomly applied in an unblinded manner from a noncentered endoluminal catheter. All patients received aspirin (100 mg/d). Primary endpoint was restenosis (>50% diameter reduction) detected by duplex ultrasound 6 months after PTA. Secondary endpoints included clinical and hemodynamic assessment. Results: Restenosis in patients undergoing EVBT was 17% (23/133) versus 35% (50/142) in patients without EVBT (p
ISSN:1526-6028
1545-1550
DOI:10.1583/04-1269MR.1