A concomitant posterior approach improves fusion rates but not overall reoperation rates in multilevel cervical fusion for spondylosis

Retrospective comparative study of 2 approaches to multilevel fusion for cervical spondylosis in consecutive patients at a single institution. To provide justification for a concomitant posterior approach in multilevel cervical fusion for spondylosis by demonstrating decreased pseudarthrosis and reoperation rates. Among the factors that affect cervical rates is the number of levels, such that increasing the number of levels leads to lower fusion rates. Because of this, modifications have been sought to improve union in multilevel procedures. One option is an antero-posterior (AP) approach or circumferential arthrodesis. Seventy-eight consecutive patients who underwent multilevel cervical fusion at a single institution and with minimum 2-year follow-up data were divided into an anterior-only group (anterior: n=55), and an AP group (AP: n=23). Union was assessed by surgical exploration, computerized tomography scan, and flexion-extension radiographs. The groups were compared in terms of pseudarthrosis rates and reoperation rates. Using chi(2) analysis, there was a significant difference in pseudarthrosis rates (anterior 38% vs. AP 0%; P