Diabetic retinopathy screening using digital non‐mydriatic fundus photography and automated image analysis
. Purpose: To investigate the use of automated image analysis for the detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in fundus photographs captured with and without pharmacological pupil dilation using a digital non‐mydriatic camera. Methods: A total of 83 patients (165 eyes) with type 1 or type 2 diabete...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica 2004-12, Vol.82 (6), p.666-672 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | .
Purpose: To investigate the use of automated image analysis for the detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in fundus photographs captured with and without pharmacological pupil dilation using a digital non‐mydriatic camera.
Methods: A total of 83 patients (165 eyes) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, representing the full spectrum of DR, were photographed with and without pharmacological pupil dilation using a digital non‐mydriatic camera. Two sets of five overlapping, non‐stereoscopic, 45‐degree field images of each eye were obtained. All images were graded in a masked fashion by two readers according to ETDRS standards and disagreements were settled by an independent adjudicator. Automated detection of red lesions as well as image quality control was made: detection of a single red lesion or insufficient image quality was categorized as possible DR.
Results: At patient level, the automated red lesion detection and image quality control combined demonstrated a sensitivity of 89.9% and specificity of 85.7% in detecting DR when used on images captured without pupil dilation, and a sensitivity of 97.0% and specificity of 75.0% when used on images captured with pupil dilation. For moderate non‐proliferative or more severe DR the sensitivity was 100% for images captured both with and without pupil dilation.
Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that the described automated image analysis system, which detects the presence or absence of DR, can be used as a first‐step screening tool in DR screening with considerable effectiveness. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1395-3907 1600-0420 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2004.00350.x |