Comparison of five usual techniques for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
The detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an usual and daily test in a microbiology laboratory. But its interpretation isn't easy because the resistance expression in vitro is so variable. The authors compare five methods about 100 clinical isolated strains. The results ar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pathologie biologie (Paris) 2004-12, Vol.52 (10), p.617-621 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | fre |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an usual and daily test in a microbiology laboratory. But its interpretation isn't easy because the resistance expression in vitro is so variable. The authors compare five methods about 100 clinical isolated strains. The results are: disk diffusion method using oxacillin 5 microg, on a NaCl 5% Mueller Hinton agar, 100 ml presentation (biorad): specificity 91%; disk diffusion method using oxacillin 5 microg, on a NaCl 5% Mueller Hinton agar, ready to use plate (AES): specificity 95%; the Oxascreen agar (BD): specificity 96%; the oxacillin cupule of ATB STAPH strip (ATB expression bioMerieux system) NaCl 2% semi solid Mueller Hinton agar medium: specificity 100% and disk diffusion method using cefoxitin 30 microg, on a Mueller Hinton agar plate (bioMerieux): specificity 100%. Therefore the cefoxitin disk diffusion method is very interesting to make better the difference between methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensible S. aureus, in association with the ATB STAPH strip. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0369-8114 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.patbio.2004.09.005 |