Prosthetic Design Considerations for Anterior Single-Implant Restorations

ABSTRACT The anterior single‐implant restoration provides a predictable solution for the partially edentulous patient. The two main approaches in prosthesis design for the single‐implant restoration are the screw‐retained and cement‐retained restorations. Although both approaches have been proven to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry 2004-05, Vol.16 (3), p.165-175
Hauptverfasser: SADAN, AVISHAI, BLATZ, MARKUS B., BELLERINO, MIKE, BLOCK, MICHAEL
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT The anterior single‐implant restoration provides a predictable solution for the partially edentulous patient. The two main approaches in prosthesis design for the single‐implant restoration are the screw‐retained and cement‐retained restorations. Although both approaches have been proven to work from a standpoint of long‐term implant stability, other considerations arise when esthetic outcome and ease of fabrication and delivery are discussed. To guarantee a predictable outcome, the dentist should choose a design that offers maximum prosthetic versatility. Combining prosthetic versatility with ease of delivery is often a clinical and laboratory challenge. Prostheses designs that provide the freedom to select a wide variety of restorative materials may be cumbersome to deliver and maintain and vice versa. This article reviews the advantages and shortcomings of each design and provides an alternative prosthesis design that combines the favorable aspects of these two restorations.
ISSN:1496-4155
1708-8240
DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00028.x