Recipient-derived hepatocytes in sex-mismatched liver allografts after liver transplantation: Early versus late transplant biopsies

The presence of microchimerism in transplanted tissues is well defined; however, the timeframe of appearance and disappearance of engraftment in liver allograft is unknown. The aims of this study were to analyze for the presence of "recipient-derived cells" in sex-mismatched individuals after liver transplantation, comparing the frequency of "recipient-derived cell repopulation" in early versus late transplant biopsies and to evaluate the relationship between "recipient-derived cell repopulation" and the severity of graft injury. Paraffin-embedded liver biopsy samples of 18 recipients were reviewed. Sixteen of them were obtained from recipients with sex-mismatched donors. The remaining two were obtained from recipients with sex-matched donors and were used as controls. Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization double-labeling method were performed on pretreated slides using anti-human hepatocyte antibody to identify hepatocytes, a mouse anti-human cytokeratin-7 to identify ductal epithelial cells, and using CEPX/Y DNA probes for visualizing X and Y chromosomes. The double-labeled slides were examined systematically using an image analyzer system. The mean time from transplantation to biopsy was 8.1 months. Eleven of the 16 samples obtained from recipients with sex-mismatched grafts demonstrated "recipient-derived hepatocyte repopulation," comprising a mean of 2.1% of the hepatocytes. In the control biopsies, none of the cells demonstrated different nuclear signals from the donor's sex origin. The presence and proportion of "recipient-derived hepatocyte repopulation" rate were significantly higher in early transplant biopsies than in late transplant biopsies (P < 0.05). Some hepatocytes of sex-mismatched liver grafts were replaced by "recipient-derived cells" during injury. Such repopulation is more common in the early liver-graft biopsies. The severity of acute cellular rejection appears to have no effect on the rate of recipient-derived repopulation.