Improving bony stability in maxillofacial surgery: use of osteogenetic materials in patients with profound (≥5 mm) maxillary advancement, a clinical study

Summary Purpose LeFort I osteotomy is a part of the standard surgical regimen in the treatment of patients with Class III dentofacial deformity. Inadequate osteosynthesis between the segments is a problem in patients with profound (≥5 mm) maxillary advancement. In this study an ideal ossification is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2009-05, Vol.62 (5), p.639-645
Hauptverfasser: Kuvat, Samet Vasfi, Çizmeci, Orhan, Biçer, Ahmet, Marşan, Gülnaz, Hocaoğlu, Emre, Bilgiç, Bilge, Emekli, Ufuk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Purpose LeFort I osteotomy is a part of the standard surgical regimen in the treatment of patients with Class III dentofacial deformity. Inadequate osteosynthesis between the segments is a problem in patients with profound (≥5 mm) maxillary advancement. In this study an ideal ossification is aimed for by applying a combination of osteoinductive and osteoconductive materials. Patients and methods Ten patients with Class III deformity were included in this study. At least 5 mm of advancement was performed on each patient, while mean maxillary advancement was 5.7 mm. Human demineralised bone matrix (DBM, 1 cc) and 20 mg bovine bone collagen-protein extracts (Colloss) were applied in between the segments following rigid fixation. Recurrence rates were calculated via cephalometric analyses. Multislice tomography images were collected after the 3 and 12 months in an effort to document ectopic or abnormal bone growth patterns, if any present. Four patients underwent a second operation for plate removal 12 months postoperatively. Bone biopsies were collected from the anterior maxillary wall. Results The cephalometric analyses performed after 3 and 12 months were identical to the analyses calculated 1 week postoperatively for each patient, ruling out recurrences. No abnormal or ectopic bone growth was observed. Peroperative examination of four patients revealed a complete or near to complete osteosynthesis line at the anterior maxillary wall. The microscopic examinations of the bony samples retrieved from these borders revealed abundant osteoblasts, osteocytes, osteoclasts and a bony regeneration mimicking intramembranous ossification with its trabecular organisation. Conclusions It is possible to achieve an acceptable line of osteosynthesis in cases in need of profound maxillary advancement by applying DBM and Colloss inbetween the bony segments.
ISSN:1748-6815
1878-0539
DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2007.09.043