Increasing the selectivity of the discriminative stimulus effects of Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol: complete substitution with methanandamide
In an attempt to increase the selectivity of the discriminative stimulus effects of Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), rats were trained to discriminate 3.2 mg/kg of this compound from a group of “other” drugs consisting of morphine (3.2 mg/kg), PCP (2.5 mg/kg), and vehicle. Acquisition of the Δ 9-THC-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior biochemistry and behavior, 2004-11, Vol.79 (3), p.431-437 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In an attempt to increase the selectivity of the discriminative stimulus effects of Δ
9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), rats were trained to discriminate 3.2 mg/kg of this compound from a group of “other” drugs consisting of morphine (3.2 mg/kg), PCP (2.5 mg/kg), and vehicle. Acquisition of the Δ
9-THC-other discrimination was rapid (38 days) and did not differ significantly from that of a group of “control” animals trained to discriminate Δ
9-THC (3.2 mg/kg) from its vehicle (33 days). In substitution (generalization) tests, a high dose of anandamide, which also severely decreased response rate, substituted partially in both the control and the Δ
9-THC-other group; (
R)-methanandamide, an analog of anandamide which is metabolized more slowly, substituted completely for Δ
9-THC in the control, and partially in the Δ
9-THC-other group; neither pentobarbital nor diazepam substituted completely for Δ
9-THC under any experimental condition. Regardless of the level of Δ
9-THC lever responding, all drugs except diazepam substituted less in the Δ
9-THC-other than in the control group. For this reason, the Δ
9-THC-other training procedure might be described as being more selective than the commonly used drug–no drug procedure. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0091-3057 1873-5177 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.08.020 |