The Use of Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR for Prostate-Specific Antigen mRNA to Discriminate between Blood Samples from Healthy Volunteers and from Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Purpose: A clinical role for nonquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) using prostate-specific antigen in blood samples from patients with prostate cancer remains undefined. Assay variation and detection of prostate-specific antigen mRNA illegitimate transcription may explain inconsistent r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical cancer research 2004-11, Vol.10 (22), p.7511-7519
Hauptverfasser: PATEL, Kinnari, WHELAN, Peter J, PRESCOTT, Stephen, BROWNHILL, Samantha C, JOHNSTON, Colin F, SELBY, Peter J, BURCHILL, Susan A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: A clinical role for nonquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) using prostate-specific antigen in blood samples from patients with prostate cancer remains undefined. Assay variation and detection of prostate-specific antigen mRNA illegitimate transcription may explain inconsistent results between studies. Defining levels of prostate-specific antigen mRNA expression in blood samples from healthy volunteers and patients with prostate cancer would allow cutoffs to be established to distinguish the two groups. Experimental Design: Quantitative real-time RT-PCR for prostate-specific antigen mRNA was established and levels of prostate-specific antigen mRNA measured in bloods samples from healthy volunteers ( n = 21) and patients with localized ( n = 27) and metastatic ( n = 40) prostate cancer. Results: Levels of prostate-specific antigen mRNA were significantly higher in blood samples from patients with metastatic prostate cancer than in blood samples from patients with localized prostate cancer ( P < 0.001) or in blood samples from healthy volunteers ( P < 0.01); levels between patients with localized prostate cancer and healthy volunteers were no different. Assay sensitivity to detect patients with metastatic prostate cancer was 68% with specificity of 95%. In patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer, monitoring response to hormonal therapy was possible with this assay. No correlation between levels of prostate-specific antigen mRNA and serum prostate-specific antigen protein levels was found, suggesting that prostate-specific antigen mRNA and serum prostate-specific antigen protein levels reflect different features of prostate cancer, i.e. , circulating tumor cells and total tumor bulk, respectively. Conclusions: Quantitative RT-PCR discriminates patients with metastatic prostate cancer from healthy volunteers and patients with localized prostate cancer but cannot discriminate patients with localized prostate cancer from healthy volunteers. A role for quantitative RT-PCR has been identified in the assessment and monitoring of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.
ISSN:1078-0432
1557-3265
DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0166