Precision of shoulder anatomical landmark calibration by two approaches: A CAST-like protocol and a new anatomical palpator method

Abstract The objective of the study was to compare the precision of shoulder anatomical landmark palpation using a CAST-like method and a newly developed anatomical palpator device (called A-Palp) using the forefinger pulp directly. The repeated-measures experimental design included four examiners t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gait & posture 2009-06, Vol.29 (4), p.587-591
Hauptverfasser: Salvia, P, Jan, S. Van Sint, Crouan, A, Vanderkerken, L, Moiseev, F, Sholukha, V, Mahieu, C, Snoeck, O, Rooze, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract The objective of the study was to compare the precision of shoulder anatomical landmark palpation using a CAST-like method and a newly developed anatomical palpator device (called A-Palp) using the forefinger pulp directly. The repeated-measures experimental design included four examiners that twice repeated measurements on eleven scapula and humerus anatomical landmarks during two sessions. Inter-session and inter-examiner precision was determined on volunteers. A-Palp accuracy was obtained from in vitro measurements and using virtual palpation on 3D bone models. Error propagation on the motion representation was also analyzed for a continuous motion of abduction movement performed in the shoulder joint. Palpation results showed that CAST and A-Palp methods lead to similar precision with the Maximal A-Palp calibration error being 1.5 mm. In vivo precision of the CAST and A-Palp methods varied between 4 mm (inter-session) and 8 mm (inter-examiner). Mean propagation of the palpation error on the motion graph representation was 2° and 5° for scapula and humerus, respectively. A-Palp accuracy was 3.6 and 8.1 mm for scapula and humerus, respectively. The A-Palp seems promising and could probably become an additional method next to today's marker-based motion analysis systems (i.e., Helen–Hayes configuration, CAST method).
ISSN:0966-6362
1879-2219
DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.12.013