Effects of a Low–Glycemic Load Diet on Resting Energy Expenditure and Heart Disease Risk Factors During Weight Loss
CONTEXT Weight loss elicits physiological adaptations relating to energy intake and expenditure that antagonize ongoing weight loss. OBJECTIVE To test whether dietary composition affects the physiological adaptations to weight loss, as assessed by resting energy expenditure. DESIGN, STUDY, AND PARTI...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2004-11, Vol.292 (20), p.2482-2490 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | CONTEXT Weight loss elicits physiological adaptations relating to energy intake
and expenditure that antagonize ongoing weight loss. OBJECTIVE To test whether dietary composition affects the physiological adaptations
to weight loss, as assessed by resting energy expenditure. DESIGN, STUDY, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized parallel-design study of 39 overweight or obese young adults
aged 18 to 40 years who received an energy-restricted diet, either low–glycemic
load or low-fat. Participants were studied in the General Clinical Research
Centers of the Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the Children’s
Hospital, Boston, Mass, before and after 10% weight loss. The study was conducted
from January 4, 2001, to May 6, 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Resting energy expenditure measured in the fasting state by indirect
calorimetry, body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, cardiovascular
disease risk factors, and self-reported hunger. RESULTS Resting energy expenditure decreased less with the low–glycemic
load diet than with the low-fat diet, expressed in absolute terms (mean [SE],
96 [24] vs 176 [27] kcal/d; P = .04) or
as a proportion (5.9% [1.5%] vs 10.6% [1.7%]; P = .05).
Participants receiving the low–glycemic load diet reported less hunger
than those receiving the low-fat diet (P = .04).
Insulin resistance (P = .01), serum triglycerides
(P = .01), C-reactive protein (P = .03), and blood pressure (P = .07
for both systolic and diastolic) improved more with the low–glycemic
load diet. Changes in body composition (fat and lean mass) in both groups
were very similar (P = .85 and P = .45, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Changes in dietary composition within prevailing norms can affect physiological
adaptations that defend body weight. Reduction in glycemic load may aid in
the prevention or treatment of obesity, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes
mellitus. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jama.292.20.2482 |