Modified Low-Flow Ultrafiltration Ameliorates Hemodynamics and Early Graft Function and Reduces Blood Loss in Living-Donor Lobar Lung Transplantation

Background This study analyzed the clinical application of modified low-flow ultrafiltration (MUF) to minimize cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-related adverse effects in patients undergoing living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT). Method The study enrolled 33 consecutive patients who underwent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of heart and lung transplantation 2009-04, Vol.28 (4), p.340-346
Hauptverfasser: Kotani, Yasuhiro, MD, PhD, Honjo, Osami, MD, PhD, Goto, Keiji, MD, PhD, Fujita, Yasufumi, MD, Ito, Atsushi, MD, Nakakura, Mahito, CE, Kawada, Masaaki, MD, PhD, Sano, Shunji, MD, PhD, Kotani, Kazutoshi, MD, PhD, Date, Hiroshi, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background This study analyzed the clinical application of modified low-flow ultrafiltration (MUF) to minimize cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-related adverse effects in patients undergoing living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT). Method The study enrolled 33 consecutive patients who underwent LDLLT from 1999 to 2004: 8 patients underwent conventional CPB without MUF (control group), and 15 underwent arteriovenous MUF (MUF-treated group). Hemodynamics, graft function, blood loss and blood transfusion requirements, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results There was a significant increase in systolic blood pressure and a decrease in pulmonary to systemic pressure ratio in the MUF-treated group ( p < 0.05). No hemodynamic changes occurred in the control group. MUF resulted in significant improvements in arterial oxygen tension/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2 /FiO2; 411 ± 107 vs 272 ± 107 mm Hg, p < 0.05) and the alveolar-arterial oxygen difference (a-aDO2 ; 158 ± 84 vs 315 ± 127 mm Hg, p < 0.05) at 15 minutes after CPB. There were no differences in PaO2 /FiO2 and A-aDO2 between the groups beyond 6 hours post-operatively. Post-operative blood loss and blood transfusion requirements were lower in the MUF-treated group than in the control group ( p < 0.05). There were no differences in survival, duration of ventilation, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay between the groups. Conclusions The low-flow MUF brought improved hemodynamics and gas exchange capacity of transplanted grafts and lowered post-operative blood loss and blood transfusion requirement. This strategy may minimize CPB-related adverse effects in patients undergoing LDLLT.
ISSN:1053-2498
1557-3117
DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2009.01.004