Comparative Analysis Between Scientific and the Media Communication Following Facial Transplantation

Abstract Purpose Our aim was to analyze the communications about three outstanding medical reports. Was there any difference in the reports of the three allografts? Was there a correlation between the media and the scientific world? Methods The Internet sites of three major newspapers were used for the media database. Those results were compared with PubMed between 2005 and 2007 using these key words: “facial graft,” “facial allograft,” “composite tissue allograft,” and names of surgeons of the graft. We did a comparative analysis using a word processor and a quality analysis software. Results We analyzed 51 articles from the media and six from the PubMed database. In PubMed, 100% of the articles were on the first graft and respected the privacy of the patient compared to 67% of the media who unveiled the identity. Conclusion The communication following a medical premiere depends on the team, which performes the act. We observed a major difference between the three cases. Ethical considerations are different for the media and for scientists. The communication management of a medical premiere takes preparation and evaluation.