Cardiometabolic Abnormalities in Current National Football League Players

Media reports suggested an increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease and premature death in former National Football League (NFL) players. The prevalence of cardiometabolic syndrome was determined in current active NFL players. The presence of cardiometabolic syndrome was defined as ≥3 of (1) b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 2009-04, Vol.103 (7), p.969-971
Hauptverfasser: Selden, Michael A., MD, Helzberg, John H., MD, Waeckerle, Joseph F., MD, Browne, Jon E., MD, Brewer, Joseph H., MD, Monaco, Michael E., MD, Tang, Fengming, MS, O'keefe, James H., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Media reports suggested an increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease and premature death in former National Football League (NFL) players. The prevalence of cardiometabolic syndrome was determined in current active NFL players. The presence of cardiometabolic syndrome was defined as ≥3 of (1) blood pressure ≥130/85 mm Hg, (2) fasting glucose ≥100 mg/dl, (3) triglycerides ≥150 mg/dl, (4) waist circumference ≥100 cm, and (5) high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≤40 mg/dl. Sixty-nine of 91 players (76%) from 1 NFL team were studied before the 2008 preseason training camp. Cardiometabolic syndrome markers, body mass index (BMI), waist-height ratio, and triglycerides/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio were compared between 69 players and an age- and gender-matched reference population from NHANES (1999 to 2002) and by player position of linemen versus nonlinemen. Blood pressure ≥130/85 mm Hg, glucose ≥100 mg/dl, and BMI ≥30 kg/m2 were significantly more prevalent in the 69 players than the NHANES cohort (28% vs 17%, p = 0.032; 19% vs 7%, p = 0.002; and 51% vs 21%, p 0.5 were significantly more common in the linemen versus the nonlinemen subgroup (22% vs 0%, p = 0.004; 100% vs 32%, p
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.12.046