Influence of guidelines on CPR decisions: an audit of clerking proforma

We audited documentation rates and implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decisions for patients admitted under the Department of Elderly Care Medicine, Mayday University Hospital, Croydon, as new guidelines and a proforma were introduced. For the first audit, data were collected from 75 departmental discharges. Following introduction of a proforma, six point prevalence audits were performed of all elderly care inpatients. Consultant documentation improved from 27/75 (36%) to 102/109 (94%), 135/148 (91%), 133/140 (95%), 96/119 (81%), 148/157 (94%) and 167/169 (98%) in audits 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 respectively. The percentages of decisions that were Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) were 64% 72%, 45%, 68% and 62% in audits 3 to 7 respectively. For audit 5 our guidelines required discussion with patient before making a DNAR order, whereas the guidelines applicable for the other audits did not stipulate discussion. The fall in documentation rates and proportion of CPR decisions that were DNAR in audit 5 were statistically significant. There was no significant difference in age, diagnosis, cognitive function or disability between patients in those audits (3–7) when these parameters were recorded. Introducing a proforma significantly improved CPR decision documentation. Obligatory discussion with a patient before issuing a DNAR order was associated with a fall in documentation of decisions.