In hospital cardiac arrest: a role for automatic defibrillation

Introduction: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) survival decreases by 10% for each minute of delay in defibrillation, however, survival rates of 98% can be achieved when defibrillation is accomplished within 30 s of collapse. Recently, a fully automated external cardioverter-defibrillator (AECD) was approv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Resuscitation 2004-11, Vol.63 (2), p.183-188
Hauptverfasser: Cusnir, Henry, Tongia, Rohit, Sheka, Karthik P., Kavesteen, David, Segal, Robert R., Nowakiwskyj, Vera N., Cassera, Frederick, Scherer, Hannah, Costello, Dolores, Valerio, Louise, Yens, David P., Shani, Jacob, Hollander, Gerald
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) survival decreases by 10% for each minute of delay in defibrillation, however, survival rates of 98% can be achieved when defibrillation is accomplished within 30 s of collapse. Recently, a fully automated external cardioverter-defibrillator (AECD) was approved by the FDA for in-hospital use. The AECD can be programmed to automatically defibrillate when a life threatening ventricular arrhythmia occurs. The purpose of this study was to assess the potential impact of in-hospital AECDs on the critical time to defibrillation in monitored hospital units. Methods: Mock emergency ( n = 18) were conducted using simulated ventricular fibrillation in various monitored units. Observers were stationed to record the time staff responded to the arrhythmia, and the time to shock. These times were compared to an AECD protocol that defibrillates automatically in an average of 38.3 s from onset of arrhythmia ( n = 18). Results: Staff versus AECD response time to arrhythmia (s) was 76.3 ± 113.7 (CI 19.8–132.8) versus 7.6 ± 0.6 (CI 7.3–7.9). Staff versus AECD time to shock was 169.2 ± 103.1 (CI 117.9–220.4) versus 38.3 ± 0.7 (CI 37.9–38.6). P-values are
ISSN:0300-9572
1873-1570
DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.05.012