Preoperative evaluation of the longitudinal spread of extrahepatic bile duct cancer using multidetector computed tomography

Background/Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and direct cholangiography in evaluating the longitudinal spread of extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Methods Images obtained from a 16-detector row scanner (MDCT) and from direct...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery 2009-03, Vol.16 (2), p.216-222
Hauptverfasser: Akamatsu, Nobuhisa, Sugawara, Yasuhiko, Osada, Hisato, Okada, Takenori, Itoyama, Shinji, Komagome, Masahiko, Shin, Nobuhiro, Ishida, Takashi, Ozawa, Fumiaki, Hashimoto, Daijo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background/Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and direct cholangiography in evaluating the longitudinal spread of extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Methods Images obtained from a 16-detector row scanner (MDCT) and from direct cholangiography (via either endoscopic naso-biliary drainage or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage) of 47 patients with histopathologically proven extrahepatic bile duct cancer were retrospectively interpreted. Differences between measures of longitudinal tumor spread determined by each modality and measures of macroscopic spread in resected specimens were assessed and compared. Results Assessments carried out using MDCT differed significantly less from the macroscopic measurements than those made using direct cholangiography ( P  
ISSN:0944-1166
1436-0691
1868-6982
DOI:10.1007/s00534-009-0045-2