Comparative study of clinical characteristics of amniotic rupture sequence with and without body wall defect: Further evidence for separation

BACKGROUND: Amniotic rupture sequence (ARS) is a disruption sequence presenting with fibrous bands, possibly emerging as a result of amniotic tear in the first trimester of gestation. Our comparative study aims to assess whether there is a difference in the clinical pattern of congenital limb and in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Birth defects research. A Clinical and molecular teratology 2009-03, Vol.85 (3), p.211-215
Hauptverfasser: Jamsheer, Aleksander, Materna-Kiryluk, Anna, Badura-Stronka, Magdalena, Wiśniewska, Katarzyna, Więckowska, Barbara, Mejnartowicz, Jan, Balcar-Boroń, Anna, Borszewska-Kornacka, Maria, Czerwionka-Szaflarska, Mieczysława, Gajewska, Elżbieta, Godula-Stuglik, Urszula, Krawczynski, Marian, Limon, Janusz, Rusin, Józef, Sawulicka-Oleszczuk, Henryka, Szwałkiewicz-Warowicka, Ewa, Świetliński, Janusz, Walczak, Mieczysław, Latos-Bieleńska, Anna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND: Amniotic rupture sequence (ARS) is a disruption sequence presenting with fibrous bands, possibly emerging as a result of amniotic tear in the first trimester of gestation. Our comparative study aims to assess whether there is a difference in the clinical pattern of congenital limb and internal organ anomalies between ARS with body wall defect (ARS‐BWD) and ARS without BWD (ARS‐L). METHODS: Among 1,706,639 births recorded between 1998 and 2006, 50 infants with a diagnosis of ARS were reported to the Polish Registry of Congenital Malformations. The information on 3 infants was incomplete, thus only 47 cases were analyzed. These infants were classified into groups of ARS‐L (38 infants) and ARS‐BWD (9 infants). RESULTS: The ARS‐BWD cases were more frequently affected by various congenital defects (overall p < 0.0001), and in particular by urogenital malformations (p = 0.003). In both groups, limb reduction defects occurred in approximately 80% of cases; however, minor and distal limb defects (phalangeal or digital amputation, pseudosyndactyly, constriction rings) predominated in the ARS‐L group (p = 0.0008). The ARS‐L group also had a higher frequency of hand and upper limb involvement. CONCLUSIONS: This observation suggests that amniotic band adhesion in ARS‐L takes place at a later development stage. Although limited by a small sample size, our study contributes to the growing evidence that both ARS entities represent two nosologically distinct conditions. Birth Defects Research (Part A), 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:1542-0752
1542-0760
DOI:10.1002/bdra.20555