Molecular methods to evaluate biodiversity in Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis strains from different origins
The spore-forming genus Bacillus includes species of industrial, clinical and environmental significance. The possibility of differentiating between Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis, toxin producers associated with illness, is a real need in monitoring potentially contaminated foods to und...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Food microbiology 2009-05, Vol.26 (3), p.259-264 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The spore-forming genus
Bacillus includes species of industrial, clinical and environmental significance. The possibility of differentiating between
Bacillus cereus and
Bacillus thuringiensis, toxin producers associated with illness, is a real need in monitoring potentially contaminated foods to understand the real distribution of
B. cereus/B. thuringiensis in different outbreak cases. As the use of DNA comparison obtains clearer results than classical microbiological methods in distinguishing
B. cereus from
B. thuringiensis in this work PCR-TTGE (Temporal Temperature Gradient gel Electrophoresis), rep-PCR and RAPD-PCR methods have been compared to assess the intra- and inter-specific variability of
B. cereus and
B. thuringiensis. 80 strains of
B. cereus and
B. thuringiensis isolated from food, patients and pesticides were analyzed using a
gyrB gene DNA sequence in TTGE; primer M13 in the RAPD-PCR and primers REP1DT and REP2DT in the rep-PCR methods. A widespread distribution of the electrophoretic profiles was obtained either for
B. cereus or for
B. thuringiensis using TTGE. rep-PCR and RAPD-PCR were not always able to group strains from the same origin or belonging to the same species. The fingerprints obtained with the rep- and RAPD-PCR methods confirm the high intraspecific variability present in
B. cereus and
B. thuringiensis indicating the difficulty to discriminate between these two species in outbreak cases. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0740-0020 1095-9998 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.fm.2008.12.012 |