Investigation of acoustic cavitation energy in a large-scale sonoreactor
Acoustic cavitation energy distributions were investigated for various frequencies such as 35, 72, 110 and 170 kHz in a large-scale sonoreactor. The energy analyses were conducted in three-dimensions and the highest and most stable cavitation energy distribution was obtained not in 35 kHz but in 72...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ultrasonics sonochemistry 2009-04, Vol.16 (4), p.552-556 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Acoustic cavitation energy distributions were investigated for various frequencies such as 35, 72, 110 and 170
kHz in a large-scale sonoreactor. The energy analyses were conducted in three-dimensions and the highest and most stable cavitation energy distribution was obtained not in 35
kHz but in 72
kHz. However, the half-cavitation-energy distance was larger in the case of 35
kHz ultrasound than in the case of 72
kHz, demonstrating that cavitation energy for one cycle was higher for a lower frequency. This discrepancy was due to the large surface area of the cavitation-energy-meter probe. In addition, 110 and 170
kHz ultrasound showed a very low and poor cavitation energy distribution. Therefore larger input power was required to optimize the use of higher frequency ultrasound in the sonoreactor with long-irradiation distance. The relationship between cavitation energy and sonochemical efficiency using potassium iodide (KI) dosimetry was best fitted quadratically. From 7.77
×
10
−10 to 4.42
×
10
−9
mol/J of sonochemical efficiency was evaluated for the cavitation energy from 31.76 to 103. 67
W. In addition, the cavitation energy attenuation was estimated under the assumption that cavitation energy measured in this study would be equivalent to sound intensity, resulting in 0.10, 0.18 and 2.44
m
−1 of the attenuation coefficient (
α) for 35, 72 and 110
kHz, respectively. Furthermore,
α/(frequency)
2 was not constant, as some previous studies have suggested. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1350-4177 1873-2828 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2008.12.004 |