Electro- and photochemical properties of a (mu-alkoxo)bis(mu-carboxylato)diruthenium complex having two tetraphenylporphinato zinc(II) moieties

The novel (mu-alkoxo)bis(mu-carboxylato)diruthenium complex K[Ru(2)(dhpta)(mu-O(2)C-p-ZnTPP)(2)] 3 was prepared by simple ligand substitution reaction. Strong antiferromagnetic interaction between two Ru(III) ions of 3 was observed with a coupling constant of -425 approximately -404 cm(-1). The cycl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dalton transactions : an international journal of inorganic chemistry 2004-10 (20), p.3283-3287
Hauptverfasser: Obata, Makoto, Tanihara, Norie, Nakai, Misaki, Harada, Masafumi, Akimoto, Seiji, Yamazaki, Iwao, Ichimura, Akio, Kinoshita, Isamu, Mikuriya, Masahiro, Hoshino, Mikio, Yano, Shigenobu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The novel (mu-alkoxo)bis(mu-carboxylato)diruthenium complex K[Ru(2)(dhpta)(mu-O(2)C-p-ZnTPP)(2)] 3 was prepared by simple ligand substitution reaction. Strong antiferromagnetic interaction between two Ru(III) ions of 3 was observed with a coupling constant of -425 approximately -404 cm(-1). The cyclic voltammogram of 3 can be explained in terms of superposition of those of ZnTPP-p-CO(2)H and K[Ru(2)(dhpta)(mu-O(2)CPh)(2)] 2, indicating no significant electrochemical interaction. The large conproportionation constant estimated from the reduction potentials for Ru(III)Ru(III) and Ru(II)Ru(III) indicates great stability of the mixed-valence state. The mixed-valence species [Ru(II)Ru(III)(dhpta)(mu-O(2)C-p-ZnTPP)(2)](2-) 4 was prepared by controlled potential electrolysis. The electronic absorption spectrum of 4 was quite similar to that of [Ru(II)Ru(III)(dhpta)(mu-O(2)CCH(3))(2)](2-) which is a typical Class II complex. The fluorescence from the S(2) state of the ZnTPP unit of 3 was significantly (78%) quenched. The electron transfer from the ZnTPP unit to Ru(III) ions in 3 is a plausible mechanism, even though energy transfer could not be ruled out completely. The free energy change for electron transfer, Delta G(CS), was estimated to be ca.-1.1 eV, which is similar to typical values for the reorganization energy lambda in polar solvents. Hence, the electron transfer scheme is situated almost at the top of the Marcus parabola, enabling ultrafast electron transfer.
ISSN:1477-9226
1477-9234
DOI:10.1039/b406410k