The relationship between perceived risk of being ticketed and self-reported seat belt use
Problem: Twenty-nine percent of Americans failed to use their seat belts in 2000. Efforts to improve safety belt usage can be enhanced by identifying specific factors that motivate belt use. Method: Motorist survey data were used to examine the effect of Perceived Risk of being Ticketed (PRT) for a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of safety research 2004, Vol.35 (4), p.383-390 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Problem: Twenty-nine percent of Americans failed to use their seat belts in 2000. Efforts to improve safety belt usage can be enhanced by identifying specific factors that motivate belt use.
Method: Motorist survey data were used to examine the effect of
Perceived Risk of being Ticketed (PRT) for a seat belt infraction on self-reported seat belt use.
Results: Analyses indicated that individuals and groups of individuals who have higher PRT typically report higher belt usage. Factorial analyses indicated that this perceived risk to belt use relationship holds both within groups with generally high (e.g., upper income) and generally low (e.g. young men) overall self-reported belt use.
Discussion: Applications of PRT to improve seat belt use are discussed.
Impact on Industry: Enforcement of existing laws, perhaps through selective traffic enforcement programs, and strengthening laws to create a higher perception of being ticketed by motorists should increase safety belt use thereby saving lives and reducing cost for individuals, government, and industry. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4375 1879-1247 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.03.015 |