Individual effect-site concentrations of propofol at return of consciousness are related to the concentrations at loss of consciousness and age in neurosurgical patients

Abstract Study Objective To investigate whether a patient's propofol effect-site concentration at return to consciousness (ROC) was related to the propofol effect-site concentration at loss of consciousness (LOC) and to patients' individual demographic parameters. Design Prospective study....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical anesthesia 2009-02, Vol.21 (1), p.3-8
Hauptverfasser: Nunes, Catarina S, Ferreira, David A, Antunes, Luís, Lobo, Francisco, Santos, Isabel A, Amorim, Pedro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Study Objective To investigate whether a patient's propofol effect-site concentration at return to consciousness (ROC) was related to the propofol effect-site concentration at loss of consciousness (LOC) and to patients' individual demographic parameters. Design Prospective study. Setting Operating room. Patients 31 ASA physical status I and II neurosurgical patients with Glasgow Coma Score > 15, and scheduled to receive total intravenous anesthesia with effect-site target controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and remifentanil. Interventions A constant propofol infusion was administered until LOC. At LOC, remifentanil started with a plasma concentration target of 2.5 ng mL−1. Main Results Propofol concentration at LOC was 4.9 ± 1 μ g mL−1 . At ROC, propofol and remifentanil concentrations were 1.16 ± 0.3 μ g mL−1 and 3.41 ± 1.5 ng mL−1 . Significant correlation was observed between propofol concentrationa at ROC and LOC, between propofol concentration at ROC and patient age (48.7 ± 15 yrs), and between propofol concentrations at ROC and LOC, divided by patient's age. Conclusions The correlation between propofol concentrations at ROC and LOC was improved by inclusion of patient age data.
ISSN:0952-8180
1873-4529
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.06.011