The Prognostic Value of BCAR1 in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer

Purpose: BCAR1, the human homologue of the rat p130Cas protein, was identified in a functional screen for human breast cancer cell proliferation resistant to antiestrogen drugs. Here, we study the prognostic value of quantitative BCAR1 levels in a large series of breast cancer specimens. Experimenta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical cancer research 2004-09, Vol.10 (18), p.6194-6202
Hauptverfasser: Dorssers, Lambert C J, Grebenchtchikov, Nicolai, Brinkman, Arend, Look, Maxime P, van Broekhoven, Simone P J, de Jong, Danielle, Peters, Harry A, Portengen, Henk, Meijer-van Gelder, Marion E, Klijn, Jan G M, van Tienoven, Doorlene T H, Geurts-Moespot, Anneke, Span, Paul N, Foekens, John A, Sweep, Fred C G J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: BCAR1, the human homologue of the rat p130Cas protein, was identified in a functional screen for human breast cancer cell proliferation resistant to antiestrogen drugs. Here, we study the prognostic value of quantitative BCAR1 levels in a large series of breast cancer specimens. Experimental Design: A specific ELISA was developed to measure BCAR1 protein levels in 2593 primary breast tumor cytosols. Tumor levels of BCAR1 were correlated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) and compared with collected data on urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1). Results: In tumor cytosols, BCAR1 protein levels varied between 0.02 and 23 ng/mg protein. BCAR1 levels exhibited a positive correlation with steroid hormone receptor levels, age and menopausal status, and uPA and PAI-1 levels. The level of BCAR1 (continuous or categorized as low, intermediate, or high) was inversely related with RFS and OS time. Multivariate analysis showed that BCAR1 levels contributed independently to a base model containing the traditional prognostic factors for both RFS and OS (both P < 0.0001). When added together with uPA and PAI-1 in the multivariate model, BCAR1 contributed independently of PAI-1 and was favored over uPA. Interaction tests allowed for additional analyses of BCAR1 protein levels in clinically relevant subgroups stratified by nodal and menopausal status. Conclusions: The quantitative BCAR1 protein level represents a prognostic factor for RFS and OS in primary breast cancer, independent of the traditional prognostic factors and the other novel marker PAI-1.
ISSN:1078-0432
1557-3265
DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0444