The Effect of Pasture Allowance and Supplementation on Feed Efficiency and Profitability of Dairy Systems
Partial budgeting was used to compare income over feed costs of high-yielding Holstein cows based on data from an experiment with 4 dietary treatments arranged in a 2×2 factorial. The factors were low (25kg DM/cow per day) and high (40kg DM/cow per day) pasture allowance (PA) and supplemental grain...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dairy science 2004-09, Vol.87 (9), p.2902-2911 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Partial budgeting was used to compare income over feed costs of high-yielding Holstein cows based on data from an experiment with 4 dietary treatments arranged in a 2×2 factorial. The factors were low (25kg DM/cow per day) and high (40kg DM/cow per day) pasture allowance (PA) and supplemental grain fed at 1kg/4kg of milk or no supplemental grain fed. The 4 treatments were low PA unsupplemented (LPAU), low PA concentrate supplementation (LPAC), high PA unsupplemented (HPAU), and high PA concentrate supplementation (HPAC). Two management systems were modeled. The first, a fixed herd size flexible rotation length model, and the second, a flexible herd size model where rotation length was fixed. The LPAC treatment yielded the highest income over feed costs, followed by the HPAC treatment. The treatment generating the lowest income was the HPAU system. The low PA systems generated more income than did the high PA systems for equivalent supplemental feeding strategies. The results also showed that feeding supplemental grain increased the income-over-feed costs compared with systems that did not feed supplemental grain. In most treatments, comparing the fixed herd against the flexible herd models, the flexible herd size model generated higher income due to the substitution of relatively low income per hectare of hay production for higher income from milk production. There were also differences in feed conversion efficiencies for milk production due to concentrate supplementation (1.04 unsupplemented vs. 1.21 supplemented), but PA did not affect the efficiency of milk production. Neither supplementation nor PA affected the feed conversion efficiency of milk fat yield. However, the efficiency of milk protein yield was affected by concentrate supplementation (0.028 unsupplemented vs. 0.034 supplemented) but not by pasture allowance. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-0302 1525-3198 |
DOI: | 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73421-9 |