Pregnancies and births after oocyte cryopreservation
To determine the potential of oocyte cryopreservation techniques. Retrospective data analysis. A tertiary infertility center. Sixty-eight patients (29 to 37 years of age) undergoing assisted reproduction procedures for infertility problems. Oocytes from women treated for infertility were cryopreserv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fertility and sterility 2004-09, Vol.82 (3), p.601-605 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To determine the potential of oocyte cryopreservation techniques.
Retrospective data analysis.
A tertiary infertility center.
Sixty-eight patients (29 to 37 years of age) undergoing assisted reproduction procedures for infertility problems.
Oocytes from women treated for infertility were cryopreserved with a slow cooling/rapid thawing protocol in which 1,2 propanediol and sucrose were used as cryoprotectants. Eighty-six thawing cycles were performed.
Rates of survival after thawing, fertilization after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, cleavage, implantation, and pregnancy.
We treated 68 patients through 86 thawing cycles.. Seven hundred thirty-seven oocytes were thawed, and 59 transfer cycles were performed. The survival rate was 37%. The fertilization and cleavage rates were 45.4% and 86.3%, respectively. A total of 15 clinical pregnancies were achieved with pregnancy rates of 25.4% per transfer and 22% per patient. There were three miscarriages, resulting in an abortion rate of 20%. Seventeen of the 104 transferred embryos implanted, corresponding to an implantation rate of 16.4%. Thirteen babies were born, 8 females and 5 males.
Statistically significant results were obtained for fertilization, cleavage, and pregnancy rates. Our results show oocyte cryopreservation may represent an alternative to embryo storage in selected cases. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0015-0282 1556-5653 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.04.025 |