Tissue-engineered injectable bone regeneration for osseointegrated dental implants

: The present study investigated a correlation between osseointegration in dental implants and an injectable tissue‐engineered bone, using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and platelet‐rich plasma (PRP). Initially, the teeth in the mandible region were extracted and the healing period was 1 month. Bone...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oral implants research 2004-10, Vol.15 (5), p.589-597
Hauptverfasser: Yamada, Yoichi, Ueda, Minoru, Naiki, Takahito, Nagasaka, Tetsuro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:: The present study investigated a correlation between osseointegration in dental implants and an injectable tissue‐engineered bone, using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and platelet‐rich plasma (PRP). Initially, the teeth in the mandible region were extracted and the healing period was 1 month. Bone defects on both sides of the mandible were prepared with a trephine bar. The defects were implanted with graft materials as follows: PRP, dog MSCs (dMSCs), and PRP, autogenous particulate cancellous bone and marrow (PCBM), and control (defect only). Two months later, the animals were evaluated by histology, and at the same time dental implants were installed. Two months later, the animals were sacrificed and nondecalcified sections were evaluated histologically and histometrically. According to the histological observations, the dMSCs/PRP group had well‐formed mature bone and neovascularization, compared with the control (defect only) and PRP groups, as was the same for the PCBM group. A higher marginal bone level was observed around implants with PRP, PCBM, and dMSCs/PRP compared with the control. Furthermore, the values describing the amount of bone–implant contact (BIC) at the bone/implant interface were significantly different between the PRP, PCBM, dMSCs/PRP, and control groups. Significant differences were also found between the dMSCs/PRP and control groups in bone density. The findings of this experimental study indicate that the use of a mixture of dMSCs/PRP results in good results such as the amount of BIC and bone density comparable with that achieved by PCBM. Résumé L'étude présente a analysé une corrélation entre l'ostéïntégration d'implants dentaires et un os injectable traité en utilisant des cellules souches mésenchymateuses (MSC) et du plasma riche en plaquette (PRP). Initialement, les dents de la région mandibulaire ont été avulsées et la période de guérison a été d'un mois. Les lésions osseuses des deux côtés de la mandibule ont été préparées avec un trépan. Les lésions ont été traitées avec les matériaux de greffe suivants : PRP, MSC canin (dMSC) et PRP, moelle l'os spongieux en petites particules autogènes (PCBM) et contrôle (lésion seulement). Deux mois plus tard, les animaux ont étéévalués et en même temps les implants dentaires ont été placés. Deux mois plus tard, les animaux ont été euthanasiés et des coupes non‐décalcifiées ont étéévaluées histologiquement et histométriquement. Suivant les observations histologiques, le groupe dMSC/PRP
ISSN:0905-7161
1600-0501
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01038.x