The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification
Introduction Parastomal hernia (PH) is a common complication of end colostomy, found in over 50% of patients. Abdominal computerized tomography (CT) may help diagnosis. The prevalence of PH may be higher than previously reported. We present a new CT classification for use in clinical practice. Meth...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Colorectal disease 2009-02, Vol.11 (2), p.173-177 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 177 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 173 |
container_title | Colorectal disease |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Moreno-Matias, J. Serra-Aracil, X. Darnell-Martin, A. Bombardo-Junca, J. Mora-Lopez, L. Alcantara-Moral, M. Rebasa, P. Ayguavives-Garnica, I. Navarro-Soto, S. |
description | Introduction Parastomal hernia (PH) is a common complication of end colostomy, found in over 50% of patients. Abdominal computerized tomography (CT) may help diagnosis. The prevalence of PH may be higher than previously reported. We present a new CT classification for use in clinical practice.
Method A cross‐sectional, descriptive observational study was carried out, assessing the clinical and radiological prevalence of PH in 75 patients with an end colostomy operated on since 1997. Clinical examinations were performed by a single surgeon. Abdominal CTs were assessed by a single radiologist.
Results PH was observed clinically in 33 (44%) of 75 patients and 27 (82%) were symptomatic. Using the classification 0 (Normal), I (Hernial sac containing stoma loop), II (Sac containing omentum), III (Sac containing a loop other than stoma), radiological PH was observed in 35 (47%) patients. Clinical/radiological concordance (Kappa index = 0.4) increased proportionally with sac size. All type‐III PHs (n = 9) were symptomatic. The combined prevalence of PH detected by one or other method was 60.8%.
Conclusion Clinical and radiological prevalence of PH is high. As there is no gold standard for PH detection, we recommend a combination of the two methods. A new classification for use in clinical practice is proposed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01564.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66823183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66823183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4724-a7c4a95bce1774f06270676f338a771c2ebca1140ba80e67278bceaff126e42e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1vEzEQhi1UREvhLyCfuO3ij43tXipVaSmVqvZShMTFmjhj6tS7DvaGJv8ebxOVK3PxSO8zr6WHEMpZy-t8WbW8U7LhkptWMGZaxmeqa7dvyMlrcPSyi8accXZM3peyYowrzc07csxNTYQUJyQ_PCJdZ_wDEQeHNHm6hgxlTD1E-oh5CEDBj5ipT7mHMaRhgmCgOCypSzFN7K6lF3TAZ-piGIJLTYZlqNmv4GqNi1BK8HWfzj-Qtx5iwY-H95R8_3r1MP_W3N5f38wvbhvXadE1oF0HZ7OFQ65155kSmimtvJQGtOZO4MIB5x1bgGGotNCmsuA9Fwo7gfKUfN73rnP6vcEy2j4UhzHCgGlTrFJGVE-ygmYPupxKyejtOoce8s5yZiffdmUnrXbSaiff9sW33dbTT4c_Nosel_8OD4IrcL4HnkPE3X8X2_n95c201oJmXxDKiNvXAshPVmmpZ_bH3bU1de7kz7mdyb9rqJ8v</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66823183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Moreno-Matias, J. ; Serra-Aracil, X. ; Darnell-Martin, A. ; Bombardo-Junca, J. ; Mora-Lopez, L. ; Alcantara-Moral, M. ; Rebasa, P. ; Ayguavives-Garnica, I. ; Navarro-Soto, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moreno-Matias, J. ; Serra-Aracil, X. ; Darnell-Martin, A. ; Bombardo-Junca, J. ; Mora-Lopez, L. ; Alcantara-Moral, M. ; Rebasa, P. ; Ayguavives-Garnica, I. ; Navarro-Soto, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Parastomal hernia (PH) is a common complication of end colostomy, found in over 50% of patients. Abdominal computerized tomography (CT) may help diagnosis. The prevalence of PH may be higher than previously reported. We present a new CT classification for use in clinical practice.
Method A cross‐sectional, descriptive observational study was carried out, assessing the clinical and radiological prevalence of PH in 75 patients with an end colostomy operated on since 1997. Clinical examinations were performed by a single surgeon. Abdominal CTs were assessed by a single radiologist.
Results PH was observed clinically in 33 (44%) of 75 patients and 27 (82%) were symptomatic. Using the classification 0 (Normal), I (Hernial sac containing stoma loop), II (Sac containing omentum), III (Sac containing a loop other than stoma), radiological PH was observed in 35 (47%) patients. Clinical/radiological concordance (Kappa index = 0.4) increased proportionally with sac size. All type‐III PHs (n = 9) were symptomatic. The combined prevalence of PH detected by one or other method was 60.8%.
Conclusion Clinical and radiological prevalence of PH is high. As there is no gold standard for PH detection, we recommend a combination of the two methods. A new classification for use in clinical practice is proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-8910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-1318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01564.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18462232</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cohort Studies ; Colostomy - adverse effects ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; CT-scan ; Female ; hernia ; Hernia, Ventral - diagnosis ; Hernia, Ventral - epidemiology ; Hernia, Ventral - etiology ; Humans ; Male ; Parastomal ; Prevalence ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Colorectal disease, 2009-02, Vol.11 (2), p.173-177</ispartof><rights>2009 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2009 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4724-a7c4a95bce1774f06270676f338a771c2ebca1140ba80e67278bceaff126e42e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4724-a7c4a95bce1774f06270676f338a771c2ebca1140ba80e67278bceaff126e42e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1463-1318.2008.01564.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1463-1318.2008.01564.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18462232$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moreno-Matias, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serra-Aracil, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darnell-Martin, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bombardo-Junca, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mora-Lopez, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alcantara-Moral, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebasa, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayguavives-Garnica, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro-Soto, S.</creatorcontrib><title>The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification</title><title>Colorectal disease</title><addtitle>Colorectal Dis</addtitle><description>Introduction Parastomal hernia (PH) is a common complication of end colostomy, found in over 50% of patients. Abdominal computerized tomography (CT) may help diagnosis. The prevalence of PH may be higher than previously reported. We present a new CT classification for use in clinical practice.
Method A cross‐sectional, descriptive observational study was carried out, assessing the clinical and radiological prevalence of PH in 75 patients with an end colostomy operated on since 1997. Clinical examinations were performed by a single surgeon. Abdominal CTs were assessed by a single radiologist.
Results PH was observed clinically in 33 (44%) of 75 patients and 27 (82%) were symptomatic. Using the classification 0 (Normal), I (Hernial sac containing stoma loop), II (Sac containing omentum), III (Sac containing a loop other than stoma), radiological PH was observed in 35 (47%) patients. Clinical/radiological concordance (Kappa index = 0.4) increased proportionally with sac size. All type‐III PHs (n = 9) were symptomatic. The combined prevalence of PH detected by one or other method was 60.8%.
Conclusion Clinical and radiological prevalence of PH is high. As there is no gold standard for PH detection, we recommend a combination of the two methods. A new classification for use in clinical practice is proposed.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Colostomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>CT-scan</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>hernia</subject><subject>Hernia, Ventral - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hernia, Ventral - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hernia, Ventral - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Parastomal</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>1462-8910</issn><issn>1463-1318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1vEzEQhi1UREvhLyCfuO3ij43tXipVaSmVqvZShMTFmjhj6tS7DvaGJv8ebxOVK3PxSO8zr6WHEMpZy-t8WbW8U7LhkptWMGZaxmeqa7dvyMlrcPSyi8accXZM3peyYowrzc07csxNTYQUJyQ_PCJdZ_wDEQeHNHm6hgxlTD1E-oh5CEDBj5ipT7mHMaRhgmCgOCypSzFN7K6lF3TAZ-piGIJLTYZlqNmv4GqNi1BK8HWfzj-Qtx5iwY-H95R8_3r1MP_W3N5f38wvbhvXadE1oF0HZ7OFQ65155kSmimtvJQGtOZO4MIB5x1bgGGotNCmsuA9Fwo7gfKUfN73rnP6vcEy2j4UhzHCgGlTrFJGVE-ygmYPupxKyejtOoce8s5yZiffdmUnrXbSaiff9sW33dbTT4c_Nosel_8OD4IrcL4HnkPE3X8X2_n95c201oJmXxDKiNvXAshPVmmpZ_bH3bU1de7kz7mdyb9rqJ8v</recordid><startdate>200902</startdate><enddate>200902</enddate><creator>Moreno-Matias, J.</creator><creator>Serra-Aracil, X.</creator><creator>Darnell-Martin, A.</creator><creator>Bombardo-Junca, J.</creator><creator>Mora-Lopez, L.</creator><creator>Alcantara-Moral, M.</creator><creator>Rebasa, P.</creator><creator>Ayguavives-Garnica, I.</creator><creator>Navarro-Soto, S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200902</creationdate><title>The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification</title><author>Moreno-Matias, J. ; Serra-Aracil, X. ; Darnell-Martin, A. ; Bombardo-Junca, J. ; Mora-Lopez, L. ; Alcantara-Moral, M. ; Rebasa, P. ; Ayguavives-Garnica, I. ; Navarro-Soto, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4724-a7c4a95bce1774f06270676f338a771c2ebca1140ba80e67278bceaff126e42e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Colostomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>CT-scan</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>hernia</topic><topic>Hernia, Ventral - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hernia, Ventral - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hernia, Ventral - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Parastomal</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moreno-Matias, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serra-Aracil, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darnell-Martin, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bombardo-Junca, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mora-Lopez, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alcantara-Moral, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebasa, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayguavives-Garnica, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro-Soto, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Colorectal disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moreno-Matias, J.</au><au>Serra-Aracil, X.</au><au>Darnell-Martin, A.</au><au>Bombardo-Junca, J.</au><au>Mora-Lopez, L.</au><au>Alcantara-Moral, M.</au><au>Rebasa, P.</au><au>Ayguavives-Garnica, I.</au><au>Navarro-Soto, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification</atitle><jtitle>Colorectal disease</jtitle><addtitle>Colorectal Dis</addtitle><date>2009-02</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>177</epage><pages>173-177</pages><issn>1462-8910</issn><eissn>1463-1318</eissn><abstract>Introduction Parastomal hernia (PH) is a common complication of end colostomy, found in over 50% of patients. Abdominal computerized tomography (CT) may help diagnosis. The prevalence of PH may be higher than previously reported. We present a new CT classification for use in clinical practice.
Method A cross‐sectional, descriptive observational study was carried out, assessing the clinical and radiological prevalence of PH in 75 patients with an end colostomy operated on since 1997. Clinical examinations were performed by a single surgeon. Abdominal CTs were assessed by a single radiologist.
Results PH was observed clinically in 33 (44%) of 75 patients and 27 (82%) were symptomatic. Using the classification 0 (Normal), I (Hernial sac containing stoma loop), II (Sac containing omentum), III (Sac containing a loop other than stoma), radiological PH was observed in 35 (47%) patients. Clinical/radiological concordance (Kappa index = 0.4) increased proportionally with sac size. All type‐III PHs (n = 9) were symptomatic. The combined prevalence of PH detected by one or other method was 60.8%.
Conclusion Clinical and radiological prevalence of PH is high. As there is no gold standard for PH detection, we recommend a combination of the two methods. A new classification for use in clinical practice is proposed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>18462232</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01564.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1462-8910 |
ispartof | Colorectal disease, 2009-02, Vol.11 (2), p.173-177 |
issn | 1462-8910 1463-1318 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66823183 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aged Cohort Studies Colostomy - adverse effects Cross-Sectional Studies CT-scan Female hernia Hernia, Ventral - diagnosis Hernia, Ventral - epidemiology Hernia, Ventral - etiology Humans Male Parastomal Prevalence Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
title | The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A23%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20prevalence%20of%20parastomal%20hernia%20after%20formation%20of%20an%20end%20colostomy.%20A%20new%20clinico-radiological%20classification&rft.jtitle=Colorectal%20disease&rft.au=Moreno-Matias,%20J.&rft.date=2009-02&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=177&rft.pages=173-177&rft.issn=1462-8910&rft.eissn=1463-1318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01564.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66823183%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66823183&rft_id=info:pmid/18462232&rfr_iscdi=true |