The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification

Introduction  Parastomal hernia (PH) is a common complication of end colostomy, found in over 50% of patients. Abdominal computerized tomography (CT) may help diagnosis. The prevalence of PH may be higher than previously reported. We present a new CT classification for use in clinical practice. Meth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Colorectal disease 2009-02, Vol.11 (2), p.173-177
Hauptverfasser: Moreno-Matias, J., Serra-Aracil, X., Darnell-Martin, A., Bombardo-Junca, J., Mora-Lopez, L., Alcantara-Moral, M., Rebasa, P., Ayguavives-Garnica, I., Navarro-Soto, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction  Parastomal hernia (PH) is a common complication of end colostomy, found in over 50% of patients. Abdominal computerized tomography (CT) may help diagnosis. The prevalence of PH may be higher than previously reported. We present a new CT classification for use in clinical practice. Method  A cross‐sectional, descriptive observational study was carried out, assessing the clinical and radiological prevalence of PH in 75 patients with an end colostomy operated on since 1997. Clinical examinations were performed by a single surgeon. Abdominal CTs were assessed by a single radiologist. Results  PH was observed clinically in 33 (44%) of 75 patients and 27 (82%) were symptomatic. Using the classification 0 (Normal), I (Hernial sac containing stoma loop), II (Sac containing omentum), III (Sac containing a loop other than stoma), radiological PH was observed in 35 (47%) patients. Clinical/radiological concordance (Kappa index = 0.4) increased proportionally with sac size. All type‐III PHs (n = 9) were symptomatic. The combined prevalence of PH detected by one or other method was 60.8%. Conclusion  Clinical and radiological prevalence of PH is high. As there is no gold standard for PH detection, we recommend a combination of the two methods. A new classification for use in clinical practice is proposed.
ISSN:1462-8910
1463-1318
DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01564.x